Saturday, November 8, 2008

Supreme Court Requires Obama To Produce Birth Certificate

Andy Martin comments on the following:

I would be very chary of repeating Mr. Berg's claims that there is a Supreme Court order to produce a BC. Berg has repeatedly been caught lying and encouraging the dissemination or false and/or inaccurate information. I don't know if he is in fact a scam artist, but he has undoubtedly tried to scam a lot of people with false claims. I doubt the Souter order exists; I asked for a copy and got nothing. Forewarned is forearmed. There is a massive gap between aggressive advocacy and nonsense or plain lying. Berg is on the wrong side of the divide.

Andy Martin
________________________________________________

Atlas Shrugs reports that Supreme Court Justice David Souter has required Barack Obama to produce the vault copy of the birth certificate (h/t Larwyn). Hopefully, Justice Souter will make it public information. Andy Martin has speculated that Senator Obama has been lying about who his father is. As well, this will quell rumors about Senator Obama's place of birth, but leaves open questions about his natural citizenship based on his Indonesian upbringing.

Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs writes:

"Souter tells Obama to produce the vault copy by December 1, 2008. I believe the messiah will defy the Justices.

Who will force the issue? Who wants to open up that pandora's box? Imagine if there is something on that birth certificate that disqualifies Obama from the office of the President. What are you going to do?

"...the Clerk also required the defendants to respond to the Writ of Certiorari (which requires the concurrence of four Justices) by December 1. At that time, Mr. Obama must present to the Court an authentic birth certificate, after which Mr. Berg will respond."


"...Also remember that on December 13, the Electoral College meets to casts its votes. If it has been determined that Mr. Obama is an illegal alien and therefore ineligible to become President of the United States, the Electors will be duty-bound to honor the Constitution."

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

agreed, it's highly questionable the only documentation of a Supreme Court order of any kind, hasn't yielded more than a PR release from Berg. that's getting into mainstream news territory, hell they still have to compete for nielsen ratings, right!

Anonymous said...

Well I assent to but I dream the post should have more info then it has.