If any person, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass any person, shall use a computer or computer network to communicate obscene, vulgar, profane, lewd, lascivious, or indecent language, or make any suggestion or proposal of an obscene nature, or threaten any illegal or immoral act, he shall be is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. A violation of this section may be prosecuted in the jurisdiction in which the communication was made or received or in the City of Richmond if the person subjected to the act is one of the following officials or employees of the Commonwealth: the Governor, Governor-elect, Lieutenant Governor, Lieutenant Governor-elect, Attorney General, or Attorney General-elect, a member or employee of the General Assembly, a justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, or a judge of the Court of Appeals of Virginia.
Friday, January 24, 2020
The Virginia Democratic Party Proposes Bill That Attacks Freedom of Speech
The Democratic Party in Virginia proposes a Virginia law that can be used to attack free speech. House Bill 1627 says:
If any person, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass any person, shall use a computer or computer network to communicate obscene, vulgar, profane, lewd, lascivious, or indecent language, or make any suggestion or proposal of an obscene nature, or threaten any illegal or immoral act, he shall be is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. A violation of this section may be prosecuted in the jurisdiction in which the communication was made or received or in the City of Richmond if the person subjected to the act is one of the following officials or employees of the Commonwealth: the Governor, Governor-elect, Lieutenant Governor, Lieutenant Governor-elect, Attorney General, or Attorney General-elect, a member or employee of the General Assembly, a justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, or a judge of the Court of Appeals of Virginia.
If any person, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass any person, shall use a computer or computer network to communicate obscene, vulgar, profane, lewd, lascivious, or indecent language, or make any suggestion or proposal of an obscene nature, or threaten any illegal or immoral act, he shall be is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. A violation of this section may be prosecuted in the jurisdiction in which the communication was made or received or in the City of Richmond if the person subjected to the act is one of the following officials or employees of the Commonwealth: the Governor, Governor-elect, Lieutenant Governor, Lieutenant Governor-elect, Attorney General, or Attorney General-elect, a member or employee of the General Assembly, a justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, or a judge of the Court of Appeals of Virginia.
Labels:
Democratic Party,
freedom of speech,
house bill 1627,
virginia
Thursday, January 23, 2020
Breitbart, the College Fix, von Mises Institute Cover "Flagship Colleges"
The study Sean Stevens and I recently put on the National Association of Scholars blog has been covered by mainstream sources, including Breitbart, the Von Mises Institute, the College Fix, WND, Campus Reform, Jonathan Turley Res Ipsa Loquitur, Legal Insurrection, Lucianne.com, Rutgers Forums, South Dakota War College, and LaCorte News.
Tuesday, January 21, 2020
Partisan Registration and Contributions of Faculty in Flagship Colleges
Sean Stevens and I have been working on a study of 12,372 professors in the
two leading private and two leading public colleges in 31 states that make
registration public (mostly closed-primary states). The National Association of Scholars has posted our findings on their blog. We cross-checked each registration against the political donations. For party registration, we find a
D:R ratio of 8.5:1, which varies by rank of institution and region. For federal
donations (from the FEC data base) we find a D:R ratio of 95:1, with only 22
Republican donors(compared to 2,081 Democratic donors) out of 12,372
professors. Federal donations among all categories of party registration,
including Republican, favor the Democrats: D:R donation ratios for
Democratic-registered professors are 251:1; for Republican-registered professors
4.6:1; for minor-party-registered professors 10:0; for unaffiliated professors
50:1; for non-registered professors 105:1. We include a school-by-school table
that facilitates comparisons.
Sunday, January 19, 2020
Senator McSally: You Said the Right Thing
Dear Senator McSally:
I've sent you a $100 contribution to thank you for standing up to CNN reporter Manu Raju. The American media has deteriorated to the point at which treating them with contempt or ignoring them are the best options for those who are not antagonistic toward the United States, freedom of speech, and freedom of enterprise.
The American media does not serve an informational purpose but rather is a state-supported publicity industry for the Democratic Party and the Deep State, including both RINOs and Democrats. To restore the possibility of progress and of freedom, there needs to be a rethinking as to the monopoly privileges the state has bestowed on the tech industry, on the air-wave networks, and on the cable networks.
The New Deal marked the beginning of Deep State subsidization of the media through litmus tests concerning support of treaty-globalization, state-subsidized finance, and big government in exchange for monopoly privileges. Those subsidies need to end, and the media needs to be rebalanced.
Sincerely,
Mitchell Langbert
I've sent you a $100 contribution to thank you for standing up to CNN reporter Manu Raju. The American media has deteriorated to the point at which treating them with contempt or ignoring them are the best options for those who are not antagonistic toward the United States, freedom of speech, and freedom of enterprise.
The American media does not serve an informational purpose but rather is a state-supported publicity industry for the Democratic Party and the Deep State, including both RINOs and Democrats. To restore the possibility of progress and of freedom, there needs to be a rethinking as to the monopoly privileges the state has bestowed on the tech industry, on the air-wave networks, and on the cable networks.
The New Deal marked the beginning of Deep State subsidization of the media through litmus tests concerning support of treaty-globalization, state-subsidized finance, and big government in exchange for monopoly privileges. Those subsidies need to end, and the media needs to be rebalanced.
Sincerely,
Mitchell Langbert
Labels:
cnn,
deep state,
litmus tests,
manu raju,
martha mcsally,
media
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)