Seidemann says that NYPIRG raises more student funding than any other student group and uses student funding for purposes completely unrelated to CUNY. When questioned, CUNY officials linked to NYPIRG have resisted investigating the corruption. NYPIRG's funding at Brooklyn College is now double the student senate's. As well, NYPIRG suppresses dissent on campus.
Seidemann gives this example of NYPIRG-related fraud at CUNY:
When 58 CUNY scientists accused NYPIRG of committing
research misconduct, the university appointed a founding member of NYPIRG—now a
CUNY vice chancellor—to look into the matter. Predictably, CUNY declined to
investigate further, falsely claiming that the research in question had not
taken place on campus.
Seidemann outlines how similar abuses have occurred around the country.
Seidemann outlines how similar abuses have occurred around the country.
As I have argued, Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code prohibits education institutes from engaging in political lobbying or ideological advocacy, but here we have colleges funneling student activities money into direct political uses that are unrelated to student activities. Not only does this seem to warrant an IRS investigation, but the parties involved should be investigated for fraud.