Anti-Science Democrats Stop Funding of Research on Male-Female Differences

Professor Emeritus Philip Carl Salzman of McGill University has written a piece in Canada's Society for Academic Freedom and Scholarship's SAFS Newsletter about anti-science Democrats' opposition to funding of high-quality research on male-female differences.  I sent a letter to Prof. Salzman asking for further information about the corrupt administrators in NSF, and I followed up with the following email to President Trump:

Dear Mr. President:

I sent this letter to Prof. Salzman in Canada, who has identified corruption in the National Science Foundation. Specifically, the NSF has allowed politically motivated feminist bigots to stop legitimate research concerning male-female differences. It is time to drain the swamp at NSF and to fire the administrators who stopped funding of the research.

Dear  Prof. Salzman:

I saw your piece in SAFS Newsletter, and I was interested in your statement that a scientific paper concerning the greater male variability hypothesis was denied funding because of political intervention in the processes of the National Science Foundation. Apparently, an anti-science, politically funded feminist group, Women in Mathematics, has access to decision makers in the Orwellian-named “National Science Foundation” and was able to stop scientific research through political pressure, apparently in favor of superstition.  Perhaps the “National Science Foundation” should be renamed the “National Superstition Foundation.”

Do you have access to or do you know someone who has access to the names of the specific decision makers in the “National Science Foundation” who have allowed political advocacy to overturn science?  I am contacting the president separately and suggesting that the age of politicization be brought to a quick end at NSF, or else that the NSF has outlived its purpose and should be closed.

Sincerely,


Professor Mitchell Langbert