Andy Martin just e-mailed this press release.
>Andy Martin tangles with a TV network over investigative techniques and the truth about Barack Obama's typewritten 1961 birth certificate. Why are the mainstream media not telling the American people the truth about Barack Obama?
(NEW YORK)(October 26, 2008) One of the national TV networks sent a Washington producer and correspondent to interview me in New York today (Sunday) and it was a spirited exchange. I don't know when any part of the interview will air, but they were asking me questions for over an hour.
So, yes, the "Mainstream Media" ("MSM") do contact me, and I respond courteously and cooperatively when scheduling permits.
But I also learn from these exchanges with the MSM. The correspondent asked me a lot of questions that represented stale information about me. I asked him what relevant stale material had to the 2008 campaign. There was no response.
And, of course, I was asked for "evidence." In light of his remarks perhaps it is time for what Rush Limbaugh calls a "caller clinic," and I will call, "Talking Back to the MSMs."
First, a little understanding about my background. Most "journalists" come out of journalism school, and they are trained how to react and report when the Wal-Mart truck overturns and spills oranges in the street. Similarly, most network "investigators" have to be good looking first, and journalists second. Anonymous producers do most of the research and investigation. TV "investigations" usually involve consumer fraud types of inquiries where someone has cheated someone else and there is a contact to prove the terms. TV seldom conducts genuine investigations.
I was not trained as a journalist. I studied English in college, and went on to law school, where I learned how to investigate and prepare a case. Unlike consumer disputes, there is seldom documentary evidence to confirm a conspiracy. That is why courts permit circumstantial evidence as probative (proving) and allow adverse inferences to be drawn from refusals to produce material in civil cases.
A lawsuit investigation is an entirely different process than a TV "investigation." How do you "interview" people that have been dead, or their living coconspirators? How do you conduct historical research? Tangible evidence can be elusive; testimonial evidence is critical. Does that mean we should suspend the search for truth? If that was the case, no criminal conspiracy could ever be prosecuted as long as the coconspirators refused to talk.
I have forty years of experience. And, I have made news over the past forty years with investigations around the world, obtaining information that no one else could elicit.
So I approached the investigation of Barack Obama's past as a preparation for a lawsuit and not as a TV show. The results are starkly different. While the MSM's have "investigated" Obama and found nothing, or whitewashed everything they did find, I have found a plethora of serious questions about him. In addition, I have been able to highlight material that was developed by others due to my interpretive and analytical experience.
With this preface we come to the TV production of Hannity's America on October 5th that has caused the Obama campaign to go ballistic with smears and counterattacks on me, and sent Hannity's rating soaring: the material involving radical anti-American revolutionary and mad bomber Bill Ayers of Chicago.
Obama exploded when I presented the first reasonable Ayers/Obama timeline on Hannity's program. I expressed an expert opinion on Ayers and Obama based on undisputed facts, circumstantial evidence and reasonable inferences drawn from the foregoing.
Could anyone outside Chicago really investigate Ayers without understanding the bizarre local culture? In what other city in America, other than Chicago with its culture of cronyism and corruption, could the mayor say that a mad bomber was an esteemed citizen? Only in Chicago.
Do you know of any violent criminals who have been praised by local officials elsewhere and promoted to high office? Send me the names. Chicago is unique because cronyism and corruption trump everything else. That is the case with Ayers and the Mayor. Ayers may be crazy, but he's Chicago crazy and he's Daley crazy. The mayor loves him because the mayor's father loved Ayers' father. Sad but true. Only in Chicago.
For forty years I have rejected, investigated, exposed and prosecuted Chicago-style cronyism and corruption. I helped send crooked Cook County judges to jail. The local media do not like me, because I embarrass them. Writers at the bankrupt Chicago Sun-Times go into apoplexy every time I expose their paltry contribution to the 2008 campaign. One moron at the Sun-Times made a vow not to write about me, and then broke his own oath. Pathetic.
I went to Hawai'i two weeks ago to ask the questions that no else one had ever asked. Why did the pieces of the Obama puzzle never fit? We were the first investigative team to land in Honolulu to pursue these conundrums about the candidate.
And we found answers. Obama is not Obama. His father was the controversial Frank Marshall Davis, who--surprised?--rose to prominence in Chicago. I did a story disclosing Obama's true father, a claim that he has not denied. Obama's silence is deafening. He knows we are ready for him if he does.
Davis may have been a proverbial "bad guy" in the eyes of conservatives, but he was well-liked in Honolulu. And he had influence in city hall. His friends are saddened that Davis' son is not being elected president, and that Davis' son travels under the false flag of another family, "Obama". The whole thing was a tragic fraud linked to Obama's childish mother, Davis' existing wife and family, and Barack Obama senior who received some vigorish in return for posing as the father.
I should point out that these family machinations and convolutions are hardly unusual or unprecedented. People discover all the time that parents they thought were their parents are not, or that siblings or cousins are not in fact the relatives they thought they were. Families do occasionally lie to each other. Obama's is not the first "switched at birth" puzzle to unravel.
That's why Obama's "father" was never a father to him. And that's why "Dreams From My Father" is devoted secretly to Obama's real father, Frank Davis, who did give his son many dreams and pointed him in the direction of Chicago, where Davis still had many contacts and longstanding relationships. When you plug Davis into the "puzzles" about Obama, there are no longer any "puzzles" or questions. The pieces all fit together nicely.
Which brings us to Obama's birth certificate. Obama has lied to the American people. Lied. Yes, lied. He is lying as you read this. He has released a piece of paper that is merely a computerized print-out from a data base. We provided a copy of a 1963-style birth certificate to the TV network. We will be returning to this document over and over again in the next week. Obama has concealed the original typewritten 1961 document. The original document in 1961 was typed, not computer-printed as is the sample published by "FactCheck.org."
Of course my revelation about Obama's real father irritated some conservatives (and Democrats) that claim Obama was born in Kenya. I have seen no admissible evidence to confirm that he was born in Kenya. One person claimed to have a "tape" of Obama's grandmother claiming to be present at his birth. Problem? Yes. The "grandmother" is not his grandmother, a fact that has continuously confused the media (yup, the Chicago Sun-Times had the wrong photo on its website for months) because of Obama's honorific references to her as "granny." Obama never met his real Kenyan "grandmother" and there is no evidence she was present at his birth.
Ironically, the TV correspondent asked me if I should "apologize" to Obama for mistakenly saying he was a Muslim at birth. I responded that Obama should apologize to the American people for lying about whom his real father was. He has falsely maintained that he is an "Obama" when he is a "Davis." I am not afraid to publish the truth as we find it, even as it may contradict what we previously thought to be true. Honesty to my audience and the relentless pursuit of the truth are my paladins. And, look for "Obama and Islam, Again," on Monday, October 27th).
The bottom line: we have embarrassed the New York Times and run circles around the mainstream media, and they don't like it. Obama unleashed his mud merchants to smear me, and only succeeded in making me a larger presence in the campaign. When I left for Honolulu, Obama had not been there in a while, and his grandmother was already in the hospital without any noticeable concern on his part. He was planning nothing. No MSM had ever conducted any investigation in Honolulu.
The minute my team started digging, everyone started paying attention and, surprise, Obama landed in his jet to visit his real (white) grandmother. Wonders never cease. Miraculously, she had made an instant recovery by the time he arrived. Many people feel he used his grandmother's illness as a pretext to come to Hawai'i. I do not view that as an unreasonable theory.
In closing, I have one question for Barack Frank Marshall Davis Obama, pretender president of the United States: why won't you allow me and the American people to see your real, original 1961 birth certificate (in Hawai'i they called a "Certificate of Live Birth.")?
Until Obama produces the original 1961 birth certificate—typewritten, not computer generated—-he will be a pretender president to the American people and me.
Only a complete moron would vote for a presidential candidate that is afraid to release a copy of his original 1961 birth certificate.
John McCain leaves a lot to be desired as a candidate, and no doubt as a president. But he is a real person. He does not have to hide either his birth certificate or his family history.
A vote for Barack Obama is a vote for a mystery man that lives in fear of his own family history, and lives in fear of what voters would do if they saw a copy of the original 1961 typewritten Certificate of Live Birth. Who is voting for this phony? Who could vote for such a phony?
Ask the Mainstream Media. They are shoving him down our throats.
Over to you Barry (Obama/Davis).
MONDAY: Barack Obama and Islam, Again (last in a series, rescheduled from October 20)
TUESDAY: Questions the Mainstream Media will not ask Barack Obama, The Cover-up: Part One (first in a series)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment