I just received the following e-mail from Andy Martin. Martin argues that Barack Obama has hidden his birth certificate with the cooperation of the PAM media. Martin accuses Barack Obama of defrauding the American people by lying about the conditions surrounding his birth and that he may be the son of left-wing writer Frank Marshall Davis, Jr. The Obama campaign has fought vigorously to prevent release of the vault copy of the birth certificate that would reveal the father's name. The record posted on various Obama websites does not include the information contained in the vault copy. The Obama campaign has not attempted to reveal a facsimile of the vault copy and has not publicly denied Martin's claims. It is no crime to be the son of a communist writer. But should Americans vote for a chronic liar like Barack Obama?
>Internet birth certificate poses new problems for Obama "cover-up" says Andy Martin
Internet powerhouse Andy Martin on future litigation in Hawai'i
"My decision to launch an investigation in Hawai'i has been fully vindicated," he says
Andy set for national TV coverage this week
ANDY MARTIN
Executive Editor
ContrarianCommentary.com
"Factually Correct, Not
Politically Correct"
ATTENTION DAYBOOK/ASSIGNMENT EDITORS
ANNOUNCEMENT OF NEW YORK NEWS CONFERENCE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Internet powerhouse Andy Martin releases Hawai'i litigation plans
"My decision to launch a Hawai'i investigation of Barack Obama's 'hidden past' has been outstandingly vindicated," he says
Andy is in New York for upcoming TV network interviews
(NEW YORK)(October 25, 2008) Internet powerhouse Andy Martin will hold a New York news conference Saturday afternoon, October 25th (today) to disclose his future course of action on Obama litigation in Hawai'i.
"We began planning our Hawai'i investigation in early September. We announced 'Operation Aloha Obama' in mid-September. People wondered why we were heading for Hawai'i when all of the political action was on the mainland. I believe our action launching an intense investigation in Hawai'i has been outstandingly vindicated by our discoveries and by the reaction of other players," Andy Martin states. "No one questions our news judgment any more.
"Now we are facing decisions on what to do with our pending lawsuit in Honolulu. We have made a fund raising appeal for support to continue the Hawai'i litigation (see below).
"It was only a week ago that we filed our first lawsuit in Hawai'i, on Friday October 17th. The judge in that case promptly signed an order scheduling a hearing. We asked the Hawai'i Supreme Court to reschedule the hearing, and to allow phone participation, and the Supreme Court denied that request.
http://www.state.hi.us/jud/opinions/sct/2008/29414ord.htm
"We will of course respect the decision of the Supreme Court and return to the Circuit Court. How we deal with the November 7th hearing remains an open question.
"My lawsuit is narrowly focused in the right court, seeking relief under the right statute, in the right state.
"The fact remains that a leading candidate for president, Barack Obama, has denied the media and denied the American people access to the original copy of his alleged 1961 birth certificate. No one has seen this document. The 'original' that Obama has distributed is a facsimile of a current computer-generated record. That is why Obama's 'certificate' has been completely discredited.
"Someone has posted on the Internet what is supposed to be a copy of a 1963 birth certificate. http://snarkybytes.com/?p=521
"Although this posting was made some weeks ago, the link was only sent to me yesterday. The online certificate could be considered a 'template' for how Obama's 1961 birth certificate should appear. But using the 1963 document as a template for 1961, it is obvious that Obama has concealed the original copy of his birth certificate.
"Obama has never issued any document that is similar to the 1963 posting; the 'certificate' posted by Obama bears no relationship to the online example posted by someone else.
"I believe the Hawai'i courts can and properly should allow access to Obama's original document. No one has seen that piece of paper and Obama has worked hard to keep that document secret.
"I have one question for Mr.-Wants-To-Be-President Obama: Why are you concealing access to the original copy of your birth certificate. WHY?"
Andy Martin's litigation is not related in any form or fashion to any other lawsuit pending in any other court.
Andy is in New York for TV network interviews.
NEWS CONFERENCE DETAILS:
WHO:
Internet powerhouse and national anti-Obama leader/author Andy Martin
WHAT:
National anti-Obama leader Andy Martin comments on his pending Hawai'i birth certificate litigation
WHERE:
Northeast corner of 57th Street and Sixth Avenue, New York (CapitalOne bank branch corner)
WHEN: Saturday, October 25, 5:00 P. M.
MEDIA CONTACT: (866) 706-2639; CELL (917) 664-9329
TO PURCHASE BOOK: Immediate shipment from Amazon.com or signed copies from http://www.OrangeStatePress.com
ANDY E-MAIL: AndyMart20@aol.com
----------------------------------------------
CONTRARIANCOMMENTARY.COM
New York-London-Washington-Chicago-San Francisco-Palm Beach
Headquarters mail:
Post Office Box 1851
New York, NY 10150-1851
Tel. (866) 706-2639
Fax (866) 707-2639
Web: ContrarianCommentary.com
E-mail: andymart20@aol.com
Andy Martin, J. D.
Professor of Law (Adj.)
Executive Editor
October 24, 2008
Dear Friends:
I am back in ContrarianCommentary.com's New York office and unpacking after our spectacularly successful Hawai'i trip.
We managed to uncover the truth about the "hidden Obama" and his true family origins. Many Americans believe that our disclosures may have drawn Obama back to Hawaii, as well as attracting other authors (Jerome Corsi is now there) to begin additional research. Few credit the "grandmother is sick" story for the suspension of Obama's campaign; Michelle now says "Toot's doing fine." Hmmm. Pretty fast recovery.
As you are probably aware, on October 17th I filed a lawsuit in the Honolulu Circuit Court seeking access to Obama's original birth certificate. I am seeking the right remedy, under the right statute, in the right court, in the right state.
The birth certificate case is still pending and I will be holding a New York news conference on Saturday (October 25th) to discuss the matter. The trial judge set a hearing for November 7th. I did not feel that November 7th was a sufficiently expeditious date in light of the election on the 4th, and I challenged that date in the Hawai'i Supreme Court through a petition for writ of mandamus.
The Hawai'i Supreme Court denied my request to expedite the hearing or to allow me to appear by telephone.
http://www.state.hi.us/jud/opinions/sct/2008/29414ord.htm
So the lawsuit is back in the Circuit Court. I have to show up in Hawai'i on November 7th if the lawsuit is to proceed. I do not know how many people will still want to pursue the disclosure of Obama's true birth certificate after November 4th. There may be many, or a few, or none.
ContrarianCommentary.com is a small organization. While we have had a massive impact on the 2008 election we operate on a limited budget. We exhausted our travel budget with the trip to investigate Obama's Hawai'i years and to file the birth certificate lawsuit.
If you would like the birth certificate battle to proceed, you can consider contributing to a fund to continue the litigation.
We will have to cover the costs of a last-minute trip to Hawai'i on November 5th, as well as the costs of appeals, perhaps more travel, etc.
Unlike the $100 contribution limit imposed by http://CommitteeofOneMilliontoDefeatBarackObama.com on political contributions, there are no limits on contributions to defray the expenses of Obama-related litigation. There is no limit on contributing to the travel and litigation expense fund because we need to fund the litigation expenses into the indefinite future.
We don't know what the costs will be but they will run in the thousands to pursue the lawsuit to a conclusion. Expenses tend to add up, particularly when you have to make last-minute reservations, pay appellate filing fees and transcript costs and generally be able to respond to court orders. In my case I will also incur penalties to change existing reservations since I would have to redo my already-paid travel plans. We may have to make more than one trip to Hawai'i.
Again, I don't have a clue whether anyone wants to pursue the birth certificate issue after the election, but I am prepared to do so if there is financial support to continue the fight.
We cannot surrender to Barack Obama on November 4th. On November 5th the battle to protect this great nation must continue whoever wins the election.
There are two ways to contribute to support the birth certificate litigation battle:
First, if you want to make an immediate online contribution through the http://CommitteeofOneMilliontoDefeatBarackObama.com, please note on your contribution that it is for Andy Martin Travel and Legal costs, and the contribution limit will be waived.
Second, you can mail checks or money orders to me at P. O. Box 1851 address in New York (see letterhead). We will close this solicitation on October 29th. If there is sufficient money on hand on the 29th, we will go forward and make the travel plans to be in Hawai'i on November 7th. If not, we will return the checks to the donors (or online contributors). (You may want to overnight any donation by Express Mail.)
Please feel free to call if you have any questions. Please note that the CommitteeofOneMilliontoDefeatBarackObama.com will also be making a fund appeal to continue fighting the Obama campaign. This letter offering to accept funds to defray the costs of expenses for the birth certificate lawsuit is separate, because we need to keep the expenses of litigation separate from the expenses of election activity.
I apologize for the fact that we will be sending out two fund raising appeals in close order, but we are going to do our beat to defeat Barack Obama and continue to seek the facts and truth about whom he is.
I am not anxious to make the long trip back to Hawai'i, but if there is public demand to fight on, we will.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Handled right, the Fed District Court throwing out Berg for lack of standing can present a political check-mate “win” on appeal for the anti-Obama side (if not in law, in the Court of Public Opinion). Here’s how: SIMPLY SPREAD AROUND OBAMA’S APPELLATE BRIEF HAVING TO ARGUE AGAINST AN AMERICAN VOTER’S RIGHT TO RAISE THE QUESTION UNDER THE CONSTITUTION. Should be a PR disaster for the Dems and Obama!!!
Post a Comment