Second Letter to President Trump Concerning Politically Correct Superstition at NSF

Dear Mr. President:

Yesterday I emailed regarding an article by Professor Philip Salzman concerning corrupt political correctness at the National "Science" Foundation.  I followed up with an email to Professor Salzman in Canada, and he responded.  I asked him who in NSF has been willing to compromise science for political correctness.  His answer is below (copied with his permission): The corruption is throughout the National "Science" Foundation. All are beholden to superstitious feminists.  Perhaps it is time to drain the NSF swamp. Professor Salzman's email follows:

Dear Professor Langbert,

Many thanks for your letter. I agree that it is very alarming when institutional custodians of science bow to, or worse, enthusiastically embrace "social justice" ideology, raising "diversity and inclusion" above merit and achievement.

To answer your question, I know NSF only from the outside, from its spoken policies and its deeds. I cannot tell you who makes these decisions, but this new culture is so pervasive, it would probably not be correct to imagine that it is the work of one or two people. I do applaud your representations to NSF.

Best wishes, 

 Philip Carl Salzman

Americans for Limited Government: Trump Is Vindicated; Media Is Humiliated

The question now is whether the intelligence agencies that attempted to entrap Trump will be investigated, which is where the investigation should have been in the first place.  The biggest disgrace is the fake media: CNN, MSNBC, NPR, the New York Times, et al.  ALG writes:

Professional Trump critics like former CIA Director John Brennan were regulars on MSNBC stoking the collusion fires later claiming that he perhaps had ‘bad information.’ The partisan media outlets like ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN and MSNBC along with the entire Corporation for Public Broadcasting taxpayer funded hierarchy breathlessly repeated planted rumor after planted rumor promising viewers that this time, they really had Donald Trump...One could hope that the left-wing corporate media machines will learn a lesson and return to journalism, but that is not what they are — instead they are advocates getting paid to culturally transform America. If anything good is to come out of this national embarrassment, it is my hope that the media emperors who have been running around with no clothes are finally seen for the frauds that they are, and as a result, the public denies them the one thing they need — viewers and listeners. 

Mueller report vindicates Trump, no conspiracy or coordination with Russia

April 18, 2019, Fairfax, Va.—Americans for Limited Government President Rick Manning today issued the following statement in response the final report by Special Counsel Robert Mueller:

“Robert Mueller’s report is a slam dunk vindication of President Trump, who was the victim of an intelligence agency operation designed to entrap him and those around him in process crime snares, even as they knew that there was not a sufficient basis to say there was any conspiracy by Trump, his campaign or any American with Russia to interfere with the election.  Mueller himself writes that ‘the evidence was not sufficient to charge that any member of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with representatives of the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election,’ which was defined as operations to do with hacking the DNC and John Podesta emails and an inconsequential social media campaign by a Russian company.

“This is unequivocal, but not a surprise to anyone who was profiteering off of this fake news driven conspiracy theory.  Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who is no friend to President Trump, said in March 2017, ‘We had no evidence of collusion.’

“Additionally, lead FBI investigator and proven Trump hater, Peter Strzok texted his then lover, FBI agent Lisa Page, that ‘there’s no big there there’ in talking about the Russia case.

“And even former CIA Director Michael Morell is quoted in March 2017 as saying, ‘There is no fire, at all.’

“Yet our nation and those associated with the Trump campaign, transition team and administration were subjected to about a three-year long investigation, including nearly two years by a special counsel who was appointed to investigate something that everyone knew was false. 

“Professional Trump critics like former CIA Director John Brennan were regulars on MSNBC stoking the collusion fires later claiming that he perhaps had ‘bad information.’ The partisan media outlets like ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN and MSNBC along with the entire Corporation for Public Broadcasting taxpayer funded hierarchy breathlessly repeated planted rumor after planted rumor promising viewers that this time, they really had Donald Trump. 

“And today in the aftermath of the collapse of their delusion, they cling to their age old approach to attack the messenger, Attorney General William Barr, because the pedestal they had built for the special counsel was too high for them to tear down in time to not have egg on their faces.

“No conspiracy with Russia by Trump is great news for America.  One could hope that the left-wing corporate media machines will learn a lesson and return to journalism, but that is not what they are — instead they are advocates getting paid to culturally transform America. If anything good is to come out of this national embarrassment, it is my hope that the media emperors who have been running around with no clothes are finally seen for the frauds that they are, and as a result, the public denies them the one thing they need — viewers and listeners.  In doing so those who have perpetuated this Russian collusion fraud through hours upon hours of anti-Trump coverage will be denied the dollars from selling soap to those very viewers who they colluded to trick into believing that Donald Trump was a traitor to his country.

“Now, the Attorney General needs to get to work to determine who abused the legal protections in place to stop this kind of intelligence abuse and take all available measures against them to make certain that this never happens again, as well as recommend reforms to ensure that the FISA Court ceases to be a rubber stamp for spying.”

To view online: https://getliberty.org/2019/04/mueller-report-vindicates-trump-no-conspiracy-or-coordination-with-russia/

Interview Availability: Please contact Americans for Limited Government at 703-383-0880 ext. 1 or at media@limitgov.org to arrange an interview.

Gold Less Bulky Than Paper Money

One of the arguments against the use of gold as money is that it is supposedly more bulky than paper money. I have recently purchased some one-tenth-ounce Canadian Maple Leaf gold coins, and I was surprised to see that they are much smaller and lighter than a stack of $20 bills.  A one-tenth-ounce gold piece is worth about $128 at current prices; it is tiny--much smaller than a $20 bill.  There was a time when $100 or $500 bills were widely used, but today because of money laundering concerns bills larger than $50 are rare.  A stack of six $20 bills weighs more and is bulkier than a $128 gold coin.

The claim that paper money is necessary because carrying gold is inconvenient is a fake rationale.

Anti-Science Democrats Stop Funding of Research on Male-Female Differences

Professor Emeritus Philip Carl Salzman of McGill University has written a piece in Canada's Society for Academic Freedom and Scholarship's SAFS Newsletter about anti-science Democrats' opposition to funding of high-quality research on male-female differences.  I sent a letter to Prof. Salzman asking for further information about the corrupt administrators in NSF, and I followed up with the following email to President Trump:

Dear Mr. President:

I sent this letter to Prof. Salzman in Canada, who has identified corruption in the National Science Foundation. Specifically, the NSF has allowed politically motivated feminist bigots to stop legitimate research concerning male-female differences. It is time to drain the swamp at NSF and to fire the administrators who stopped funding of the research.

Dear  Prof. Salzman:

I saw your piece in SAFS Newsletter, and I was interested in your statement that a scientific paper concerning the greater male variability hypothesis was denied funding because of political intervention in the processes of the National Science Foundation. Apparently, an anti-science, politically funded feminist group, Women in Mathematics, has access to decision makers in the Orwellian-named “National Science Foundation” and was able to stop scientific research through political pressure, apparently in favor of superstition.  Perhaps the “National Science Foundation” should be renamed the “National Superstition Foundation.”

Do you have access to or do you know someone who has access to the names of the specific decision makers in the “National Science Foundation” who have allowed political advocacy to overturn science?  I am contacting the president separately and suggesting that the age of politicization be brought to a quick end at NSF, or else that the NSF has outlived its purpose and should be closed.

Sincerely,


Professor Mitchell Langbert