A reader recommended this Commieblaster.com video. It overdoes the conspiracy slant. Historians have long noticed that big business in America has always been sympathetic to Marxism. The footage of Bill Gates is priceless. His left-wing sympathies are no surprise. What better tool to shore up a mediocre firm like Microsoft than to illegalize your competition, making your own business the legal norm?
Americans are foolish to be taken in by the likes of Soros, Gates, et al. To the extent that they have, the quality of life in America has declined sharply over my lifetime (the past 56 years) and will decline even more sharply.
To counter the propaganda Americans must take back control of the schools and abolish the Federal Reserve Bank. Without the massive Fed subsidies that large scale business receives, the scale of American industry would be far smaller in general and the effectiveness of the greedy big business socialist left's tactics would be significantly reduced or even eliminated. Among the wealthy described in the video, at least half, Buffett, Soros, Rockefeller (as far as the current Rockefeller trust, not the original fortune) and Bloomberg, for instance, owe the bulk of their wealth to the Federal Reserve Bank, not to a market economy.
Saturday, April 24, 2010
Obama on 212*
I just sent this letter to Brian Hollander of the Woodstock Times.
Dear Editor:
There's a rumor circulating in Olive that if anyone questions any of President Obama's policies in the Village of Woodstock he will be sent to Lubyanka Prison-On-the-Sawkill for violating Article 58, paragraph 10 of the limousine liberal code, to wit, violating provisions against "anti-Obama propaganda." We here in the free world, where there is no pro-Obama censorship, aim to educate you as to what has happened.
In 1996 NBC, a General Electric subsidiary, and Microsoft, decided to form a cable television station, MS-NBC. GE owns 82%. It so happens that GE, besides making dish washers and television shows, has a taste for badly run financial institutions closely linked to Wall Street.
In 2008, Wall Street, realizing that the massive, Democratic Party-installed subsidies that it receives from the Federal Reserve Bank each year would be insufficient for its extraordinary incompetence, decided that it needed a reliable lackey in the White House. The Street wanted bailout money; regulation to put smaller competitors at a disadvantage; and ever-increasing expansion of the monetary base.
It was determined that these objectives are best accomplished through a limousine liberal who claims to be helping the poor when in fact he is helping the rich, someone much like those who enforce Article 58, paragraph 10 of the limousine liberal code on Tinker Street. Someone acceptable to George Soros and Warren Buffett. So in 2008 both Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs donated an unprecedented 2:1 in favor of the Obama campaign. And GE's employees at MS-NBC such as Chris Matthews told the limousine liberals of Woodstock, who quaintly believe themselves to be especially clever but can't figure out that Matthews works for GE, to rally behind their new comrade, Barack Hussein Obama.
Mr. Obama was elected. Monetary reserves having been tripled in 2008 by Wall Street's previous lackey, George W. Bush, have been maintained and reenforced. The Iraqi and Afghanistan wars that motivate monetary expansion that contributes to the stock market's health have been steadfastly maintained. As well, Mr. Obama and the Democrats put forward a regulation plan that Morgan and Goldman absolutely love. The chief effect of Mr. Obama's health bill was to tax lower income Americans who are not covered and previously got emergency room care for free. The stock market went up for four straight days following the health care law's passage. Indeed, the market has been having a great ride as a result of all the new Obama money rolling out of the Democratic Party-installed printing presses. Chris Mathews's supervisors at GE are especially happy because of the bailout. Both George Soros and Henry Paulson are investing in gold. And President Obama's supervisors at Goldman are rolling in dough, having earned over $3 billion in the last quarter.
Sincerely,
Mitchell Langbert
*Route 212 runs from the Town of Shandaken to the Village of Saugerties, NY. When it passes through Woodstock it is called Tinker Street.
Friday, April 23, 2010
Letter to IRS Re Southern Poverty Law Center
PO Box 130
West Shokan, New York 12494
April 22, 2010
Lois G. Lerner, Director
Exempt Organizations Division
Internal Revenue Service
1111 Constitution Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20224
Dear Ms. Lerner:
I am a former contributor to the Southern Poverty Law Center. The Southern Poverty Law Center is a 501 (c) (3) organization. I have become increasingly concerned by the Center's apparent involvement in politically partisan advocacy, in particular advocacy and support of the election of President Barack Obama. Although many have been enthusiastic about President Obama's election, the dissemination of propaganda on his behalf is not permissible under the tax code.
The Southern Poverty Law Center has invented disinformation concerning the so-called "Tea Party" movement, which is in essence a movement that concerns partisan politics and specifically opposes socialism and the increasing scope of government. Without competence or knowledge, the Southern Poverty Law Center has been libeling the Tea Party movement, accusing it of violence that parallels that of fringe groups whom the SPLC has traditionally monitored. In fact, the Tea Party constitutes 17% of the American electorate, according to a recent poll. The SPLC has made radical, unverified accusations about the Tea Party in an effort to support the Democratic Party and Barack Obama.
Further evidence of the SPLC's political nature might include the absence of a single Republican from their board; other propaganda-style attacks on behalf of additional Democratic candidates; and any direct involvement of the group's officers with the Democratic Party.
I urge you to investigate the Southern Poverty Law Center. I contributed to them in good faith for many years in the 1980s and 1990s because I believed them to be an anti-bias and anti-KKK organization. However, as a member of the Tea Party movement, I now learn that they are calling me ugly names because I do not believe in their socialist political program.
Sincerely,
Mitchell Langbert
West Shokan, New York 12494
April 22, 2010
Lois G. Lerner, Director
Exempt Organizations Division
Internal Revenue Service
1111 Constitution Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20224
Dear Ms. Lerner:
I am a former contributor to the Southern Poverty Law Center. The Southern Poverty Law Center is a 501 (c) (3) organization. I have become increasingly concerned by the Center's apparent involvement in politically partisan advocacy, in particular advocacy and support of the election of President Barack Obama. Although many have been enthusiastic about President Obama's election, the dissemination of propaganda on his behalf is not permissible under the tax code.
The Southern Poverty Law Center has invented disinformation concerning the so-called "Tea Party" movement, which is in essence a movement that concerns partisan politics and specifically opposes socialism and the increasing scope of government. Without competence or knowledge, the Southern Poverty Law Center has been libeling the Tea Party movement, accusing it of violence that parallels that of fringe groups whom the SPLC has traditionally monitored. In fact, the Tea Party constitutes 17% of the American electorate, according to a recent poll. The SPLC has made radical, unverified accusations about the Tea Party in an effort to support the Democratic Party and Barack Obama.
Further evidence of the SPLC's political nature might include the absence of a single Republican from their board; other propaganda-style attacks on behalf of additional Democratic candidates; and any direct involvement of the group's officers with the Democratic Party.
I urge you to investigate the Southern Poverty Law Center. I contributed to them in good faith for many years in the 1980s and 1990s because I believed them to be an anti-bias and anti-KKK organization. However, as a member of the Tea Party movement, I now learn that they are calling me ugly names because I do not believe in their socialist political program.
Sincerely,
Mitchell Langbert
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Senate Republicans Ready to Jump On Democrats' Big Government Regulation Gravy Train
I just received this letter from John Tate of the Campaign for Liberty. Read it, take action and weep. Can American democracy have failed this badly that the response to the failures of the Federal Reserve-Investment Banking nexus is to strengthen both?
April 22, 2010
Dear Mitchell ,
Despite all the limited government rhetoric you're hearing from the Republican Party these days, it appears that Senate Republican leaders, including Richard Shelby, are more than ready and willing to work with Chris Dodd to empower the Fed, add more layers of federal bureaucracy to our economy, and set the stage for future crises.
According to Talking Points Memo, Shelby has stated, "We're very close to a deal and there will be a substantial number of Republicans that go along with it."
The White House is doing everything it can in the media to cram yet another powergrab down the American people's throats. A vote could come at any time, so it's crucial that liberty activists make their voices heard immediately.
Keep reading for more information on how to contact your senators.
Chris Dodd's legislation, which should be called the "Fed Empowerment Act," ignores the true cause of the recent financial downturn: interference in our economy and manipulation of our currency by Congress, the Treasury, and the Federal Reserve.
For all the talk of "change" in D.C., our elected officials are following the same tired old script: if the federal government created the problem, the only solution must be to give it even more power.
Now Senate leaders want to create a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which will be housed in and funded by the Fed.
And the Dodd bill would create a "Financial Stability Oversight Council" that would have the ability to require nonbank financial companies to be under the Federal Reserve's supervision based not on their current status, but on what effect they may potentially have on the economy!
Who knows how many businesses will soon be targeted and broken up, under the guise of "reform," solely for standing up to the federal government.
Recently, Washington Examiner journalist Tim Carney has done some terrific work exposing the corporatism behind the White House's rhetoric.
To see how Obama's "reform" plan will actually benefit the big banks and Wall Street firms, especially Goldman Sachs, at the expense of smaller companies and the rest of us, click here to read his piece entitled "Goldman rallies for Obama in Wall Street 'reform'."
Don't let Chris Dodd strengthen the federal government and further entangle the Federal Reserve in our economy without a fight.
Remind your elected officials that any serious effort at true financial reform should start with thoroughly auditing the Federal Reserve.
Click here to get contact information for your senators. Tell them to reject Chris Dodd's Fed Empowerment Act and to stand up for transparency by working for a standalone vote on Audit the Fed, S. 604!
The American people have already suffered too much because of Washington's previous interference in our economy.
Together, let's take a stand for freedom and true reform by opposing the Dodd Fed Empowerment Act and pushing for a long overdue standalone vote on Audit the Fed.
In Liberty,
John Tate
President
April 22, 2010
Dear Mitchell ,
Despite all the limited government rhetoric you're hearing from the Republican Party these days, it appears that Senate Republican leaders, including Richard Shelby, are more than ready and willing to work with Chris Dodd to empower the Fed, add more layers of federal bureaucracy to our economy, and set the stage for future crises.
According to Talking Points Memo, Shelby has stated, "We're very close to a deal and there will be a substantial number of Republicans that go along with it."
The White House is doing everything it can in the media to cram yet another powergrab down the American people's throats. A vote could come at any time, so it's crucial that liberty activists make their voices heard immediately.
Keep reading for more information on how to contact your senators.
Chris Dodd's legislation, which should be called the "Fed Empowerment Act," ignores the true cause of the recent financial downturn: interference in our economy and manipulation of our currency by Congress, the Treasury, and the Federal Reserve.
For all the talk of "change" in D.C., our elected officials are following the same tired old script: if the federal government created the problem, the only solution must be to give it even more power.
Now Senate leaders want to create a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which will be housed in and funded by the Fed.
And the Dodd bill would create a "Financial Stability Oversight Council" that would have the ability to require nonbank financial companies to be under the Federal Reserve's supervision based not on their current status, but on what effect they may potentially have on the economy!
Who knows how many businesses will soon be targeted and broken up, under the guise of "reform," solely for standing up to the federal government.
Recently, Washington Examiner journalist Tim Carney has done some terrific work exposing the corporatism behind the White House's rhetoric.
To see how Obama's "reform" plan will actually benefit the big banks and Wall Street firms, especially Goldman Sachs, at the expense of smaller companies and the rest of us, click here to read his piece entitled "Goldman rallies for Obama in Wall Street 'reform'."
Don't let Chris Dodd strengthen the federal government and further entangle the Federal Reserve in our economy without a fight.
Remind your elected officials that any serious effort at true financial reform should start with thoroughly auditing the Federal Reserve.
Click here to get contact information for your senators. Tell them to reject Chris Dodd's Fed Empowerment Act and to stand up for transparency by working for a standalone vote on Audit the Fed, S. 604!
The American people have already suffered too much because of Washington's previous interference in our economy.
Together, let's take a stand for freedom and true reform by opposing the Dodd Fed Empowerment Act and pushing for a long overdue standalone vote on Audit the Fed.
In Liberty,
John Tate
President
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
