My article "Time to Rethink Government Unions" appears in the current issue
of Frontpagemag. I had researched the material about the CUNY faculty
union several months earlier, and the Supreme Court's Harris v. Quinn
decision on June 30 gave me a context in which to embed the CUNY material.
I relied on interviews with David Seidemann and an anonymous officer of the
PSC who gave me reams of information about the bizarre goings-on at the PSC Delegate Assembly and Executive Council
meetings.
The most striking phenomenon I observed during my research was the PSC leadership's omertà . The unwillingness to talk to me extended to the out-group led by former candidate Richard Boris and retired union president Irwin Polishook.
Especially boorish was Stanley Aronowitz, who agreed to be interviewed by phone at specific times, yet when I called at those times he didn't answer. He didn't four times. The PSC's leadership advocates a suppressive ideology, socialism, so it's not surprising that they don't refrain from using violence to take money from members, using the money in violation of the members' free speech rights, and then covering up their actions. Cover-ups are only problematic when Republicans engage in them.
Thursday, July 17, 2014
Tuesday, July 15, 2014
Democratic Foundation Finds That Tea Party Donations Came from Average Americans
One of the misleading tales about the Tea Party that media sources have spread is that the movement has been supported by wealthy-one percent donors. The Roosevelt Institute, whose aim is to further the aims of Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt, funded a study that found the opposite: Much of the Tea Party candidates' donations have come from average Americans.
It is true that the authors, Ferguson, Jorgenson, and Chen, conclude "The Tea Party and its allies cannot sensibly be treated solely in terms of mass politics." They also note, of course, that Obama, the Democratic Party, and their allies cannot be treated solely in terms of mass politics. Indeed, that is the gist of Ferguson's extensive writings: Capital intensive and pro-free-trade industries supported Roosevelt, and among the supporters were Standard Oil and an array of investment banks that opposed JP Morgan Jr. In other words, the authors are willing to concede that there is public support for free market-based candidates just as there is public support for collectivist ones.
That shows considerable integrity. It is inconceivable to most collectivists that average Americans might prefer freedom; it is inconceivable to them that hardworking, blue collar workers might prefer lower to higher taxes; it is inconceivable to them that those who prefer to support themselves free of government authority might prefer being paid fairly for their labor instead of living off government subsidies, welfare scams, or the Social Security pyramid scheme.
Although I disagree with their politics, the authors of the study are exceptional scholars who have carefully tested the lead author's, Thomas Ferguson's, insightful investment theory of politics. They write this:
It is true that the authors, Ferguson, Jorgenson, and Chen, conclude "The Tea Party and its allies cannot sensibly be treated solely in terms of mass politics." They also note, of course, that Obama, the Democratic Party, and their allies cannot be treated solely in terms of mass politics. Indeed, that is the gist of Ferguson's extensive writings: Capital intensive and pro-free-trade industries supported Roosevelt, and among the supporters were Standard Oil and an array of investment banks that opposed JP Morgan Jr. In other words, the authors are willing to concede that there is public support for free market-based candidates just as there is public support for collectivist ones.
That shows considerable integrity. It is inconceivable to most collectivists that average Americans might prefer freedom; it is inconceivable to them that hardworking, blue collar workers might prefer lower to higher taxes; it is inconceivable to them that those who prefer to support themselves free of government authority might prefer being paid fairly for their labor instead of living off government subsidies, welfare scams, or the Social Security pyramid scheme.
Although I disagree with their politics, the authors of the study are exceptional scholars who have carefully tested the lead author's, Thomas Ferguson's, insightful investment theory of politics. They write this:
The statistics in Table 1 provide the answer, which is somewhat surprising. Bachmann, Cain, and Paul attracted truly significant percentages of unitemized funds – essentially half or more of all their funds. Though we suspect Republican donors are likely to be somewhat wealthier than most Democratic donors, we do not doubt that most of this money streamed in from people reasonably described as “average Americans” too. Gingrich and Santorum also attracted significant amounts from this quarter. By contrast, Huntsman’s and Texas Governor Rick Perry’s contributions of this type were plainly derisory.
Labels:
donations,
investment theory,
jie chen,
paul jorgenson,
tea party,
thomas ferguson
Sunday, July 13, 2014
Twin Peaks
I'm watching Twin Peaks for the fourth or fifth time. I put the following review up on Netflix. Some of the commenters claim that Netflix is thinking of doing a sequel or remake. In January 2008 I suggested that HBO do one, but Netflix would be even better.
This is one of my favorite TV programs. It combines imagination
with satire, comedy with spirituality, sci fi and horror with social
commentary. The eerie music is a metaphor for the unconscious: Maddy
Ferguson's murder occurs in a gap in Julee Cruise's song, for it is
through art that inner forces, including terrible ones, are revealed. The
program is about immanence, the truth within, and transcendence, the greater
truth. False immanence, Killer Bob, takes possession of souls, and true
immanence, both the corruption beneath the town's surface and the good in the
Bookhouse Boys, Donna Hayward (Lara Flynn Boyle), and James Hurley (James
Marshall) intersect. Agent Cooper's (Kyle Maclachlan's) struggle, like that of
any seeker, is to reveal immanence and seek transcendence. Good as well as evil
are satirized; as in some of WH Auden's poems ("As I Walked Out One Evening"),
cliches expressed as satire transcend themselves as art. Through art we achieve understanding.
Lynch's cast, a hodgepodge of talented actors and amateurs, comprise a bohemian Diane Arbus-like ensemble. (Is it a coincidence that Cooper continually records messages to "Diane"?) The cast is an expression of Lynch and Frost's
artistry. It is tragic that ABC allowed the show to run for
only 35 episodes, but yes, we are fortunate that ABC allowed it to run at all.
Thursday, July 10, 2014
Defund the IRS
Steve Forbes hits a home run in the current issue of Forbes: Because of the IRS targeting-of-conservatives scandal, which is reminiscent of the fascistic Europe that Obama and his morally diseased supporters idealize and hope to emulate, the IRS should be defunded until the scandals are resolved.
Forbes notes that the current Obama administration is wracked with scandal more significant than the Teapot Dome in the 1920s, which preceded Warren G. Harding's death, and Watergate. For some reason the totalitarians in the Democratic Party claim that their Fuehrer did not know, a claim that they would have ridiculed in 1974 when Nixon was president.
Forbes does not go far enough, of course. The IRS is a criminal organization that should be permanently closed, not just until the Obama scandal is investigated. With a crooked, fascistic president in Washington, the claim that the federal government is a force for good is nonsense.
Forbes notes that the current Obama administration is wracked with scandal more significant than the Teapot Dome in the 1920s, which preceded Warren G. Harding's death, and Watergate. For some reason the totalitarians in the Democratic Party claim that their Fuehrer did not know, a claim that they would have ridiculed in 1974 when Nixon was president.
Forbes does not go far enough, of course. The IRS is a criminal organization that should be permanently closed, not just until the Obama scandal is investigated. With a crooked, fascistic president in Washington, the claim that the federal government is a force for good is nonsense.
Labels:
defund,
irs,
obama,
obamagate,
steve forbes
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
