Sunday, June 26, 2011

Letter to Michele Bachmann Concerning the Fed

PO Box 130
West Shokan, NY 12494
June 26, 2011

Michele Bachmann
103 Cannon HOB
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Ms. Bachmann:

Please take a position concerning the Federal Reserve Bank and the legal tender law.

I recently gave a small contribution to your campaign and to Ron Paul's and Gary Johnson's. I am not certain that I will vote for a Republican in November 2012, though.  One reason I contributed to you is the legacy media's bias against you.

In order for me to continue to support your candidacy I will need to know where you stand on the Federal Reserve Bank. You need to be specific.  Stephen Moore's recent Wall Street Journal article* about you was unconvincing. Moore indicates that you would appoint a different Fed chairman than Bernanke, not that you would eliminate the post altogether. I appreciate your opposition to TARP.  But the headline referred to Ludwig von Mises while the authors whom you admire include Art Laffer and Milton Friedman.  Milton Friedman's monetarism and Art Laffer's supply-side economics depend on big government.  Perhaps you might base your position on Hayek's essay "Denationalisation of Money." 

I await your position on the Fed, which is the decisive one concerning big government, for the Fed is a necessary and sufficient condition for big government.

Sincerely,


Mitchell Langbert, Ph.D.

*http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304259304576375491103635726.html?KEYWORDS=bachmann

Thursday, June 23, 2011

FBI Investigates Long Time Obama Comrades

Mairi sent me this article from Accuracy in Media. AIM says that according to The Washington Post, the FBI is conducting an investigation of communists in Chicago that has reached "Chicagoans who crossed paths with Obama when he was a young state senator and some who have been active in labor unions that supported his political rise.” Also according to AIM:

Those under investigation are suspected of providing support to foreign terrorist organizations such as the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine in the Middle East, a Marxist group. The Post called them 'Colombian and Palestinian groups designated by the U.S. government as terrorists.'

The FBI must be a racist organization. The proof: they are investigating Obama's associates. Obama's media supporters probably won't explain why the president possibly has associated with terrorists. After all, in The Economist's view, presidents rise to the office. Perhaps in four years the Democrats will run Bill Ayers himself.

Saturday, June 18, 2011

United States of America, RIP


I just received this e-mail. Professor Tyler was prescient, but he omits one point. In American democracy the ideology of freedom and the ideology of hard money had to be replaced before the ideology of Progressivism or socialism could replace them. This was done by ideologues posing as experts in fields like economics and sociology.  Also, American socialism does not even benefit the voting mob. It benefits a thin layer of super-rich, who have used Progressive and socialist ideologies to explain their money grab. The e-mail reads:
 
In 1887 Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the University of Edinborough, had this to say about the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2,000 years prior:

"A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse over loose fiscal policy, (which is) always followed by a dictatorship."

"The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence:

From bondage to spiritual faith;
From spiritual faith to great courage;
From courage to liberty;
From liberty to abundance;
From abundance to complacency;
From complacency to apathy;
From apathy to dependence;
From dependence back into bondage."
The Obituary follows:

Born 1776, Died 2012 
It doesn't hurt to read this several times.
           
Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law in  St. Paul , Minnesota , points out some interesting facts concerning the last Presidential election:

Number of States won by:          Obama: 19          McCain: 29
Square miles of land won by:      Obama: 580,000    McCain: 2,427,000
Population of counties won by:    Obama: 127 million  McCain: 143 million
Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by:  Obama: 13.2  McCain: 2.1 

Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory McCain won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country.

Obama territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in low income tenements and living off various forms of government welfare..."

Olson believes the  United States  is now somewhere between the "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase.

If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called illegal's - and they vote - then we can say goodbye to the USA  in fewer than five years.

If you are in favor of this, then by all means, delete this message.

If you are not, then pass this along to help everyone realize just how much is at stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest danger to our freedom.

This is truly scary! Of course we are not a democracy, we are a Constitutional Republic. Someone should point this out to Obama. Of course we know he and too many others pay little attention to The Constitution. There couldn't be more at stake than on November 2012.

If you are as concerned as I am, please pass this along.


Thursday, June 16, 2011

University Economics Reminiscent of Rowan and Martin's Laugh-In




Those who were old enough to watch prime-time television in 1973 remember Rowan and Martin's Laugh-In.  In the upper clip Goldie Hawn mimics an American economist in explaining time zone differences. The second is a compilation of R&M routines. Rowan was the straight man, Martin the comedian.

American economists are like Rowan and Martin.  Monetarists are like Rowan, Keynesians like Martin.  Neither are scientists.  Scientists are open to falsification of their theories.  If evidence disproves a theory, scientists reformulate the theory. Keynesians and monetarists have both seen their theories fail, and both stick to their theories but look for excuses, many of which are as funny as Rowan and Martin routines.  They are ideologues, not scientists. Ideologues can be funny.

First, Martin opens the act. Keynesians claim that lack of demand causes depressions so we needed to print lots of money and borrow and give the money to George Soros and other Democratic Party special interests. But demand in 2008 was at record levels. No one was saving.  In fact, there had been a lack-of-savings crisis because of excessive credit.  But Keynesian theory says that depressions are caused by insufficient demand, too much saving.  Like a carpenter who only has a hammer and sees everything as a nail, Keynesians then concluded that there needed to be more credit and more debt.  Laugh one. Spending is at record levels, and the banking crisis was caused by insufficient demand. Ha, ha.

The problem of 2000-08 was an incompetently managed financial system, and an incompetently run Federal Reserve Bank. The Fed lent huge amounts of its counterfeit money to people unable to invest it intelligently: banks, Wall Street, hedge funds and big business. The result was the sub-prime and derivatives crises, the products of excessive demand brought about by an immoral and incompetently run financial system.  The derivatives investment did not involve too little demand. It involved excessive demand and fraud. By "fraud" I refer to the Federal Reserve Bank's counterfeiting power by which it creates new money and transfers wealth to its privileged and generally incompetent clients.  Commercial banking and Wall Street lack the ability to find investments that cause real wealth to grow. They are risk averse and focus on what they perceive as sure bets: real estate and big business lending. Even with the risk aversion, Wall Street's stupidity and greed means that it cannot function without ongoing public subsidy.  The financial system is value destroying. It is a failure.

Enter Rown, the monetarist straight man.  In 2005, right before his death, Milton Friedman boasted in the pages of  The Wall Street Journal of how great a success the 2002-4 monetary expansion under Alan Greenspan and the Bush administration had been.  It was, he said, proof of the success of his ideas.  It would have been interesting to hear him explain the credit disaster of 2008, which also was entirely due to Friedman's ideas, to Greenspan and to Bush.

Next, Martin, the Keynesian comedian, comes up with an idea. Actually it's the same idea because Keynesians only have one idea.  Since excessive credit, bad investment and incompetent management of financial institutions caused an economic crisis, we can still blame the economic problems of 2008 on insufficient demand.  (Audience laughs.)  Even though the $900 billion given to Soros, organized crime-run construction firms and ACORN  did not stimulate the economy, we need to give even more, trillions, to Democratic Party cronies. After all, the fact that the stimulus did not work is proof that it works. 

Rowan, the straight man-monetarist, cocks back his head.  "Give more money to Soros-like crooks?" You're out of your mind," Rowan says. "No, no, that's big government. I'm for small government. Print more money and give it Lloyd Blankenfein, not Soros. Keynesians are irrational and in favor of big government. Soros is big government. Blankenfein is small government." (Audience laughs, then applauds.)

The definition of science is the willingness to falsify hypotheses. Keynesian ideas have never worked. But Keynesians have creatively cooked up stories to explain the failure of their ideas, such as the claim that the spending of World War II ended the Great Depression. In fact, there had been rationing, suppression of wages, many potential workers killed, four years of military pay to 14 million Americans and massive misallocation of wealth during the war.  As well, Europe's and Japan's industrial bases had been destroyed, and the US was a source of supply. Sweden, which also did not suffer damage from the war, saw its economy perform well afterward. That employment grew in the 1940s and '50s after years of frustrated demand, artificially induced economic collapse, and the elimination of most of our international competitors is not proof that borrowing and spending improves the economy. It is simply proof that low wages stimulate demand for workers and that competition is eliminated when competitors bomb each other.

So, dear friend, enjoy the entertainment. Keep voting for Democrats and Republicans who are Keynesians and monetarists, keep printing money and giving it to a failed financial system, keep making yourself poorer and keep destroying innovation. Like Rowan & Martin, the American democracy and the legacy media provide us with a laugh-in.