Wednesday, May 11, 2011

UN Agenda 21: How the Bush and Obama Administrations Planned to Wreck Your Future

I spent the afternoon with a friend planning work on UN Agenda 21.  UNESCO already has management power over a number of US federal parks.  Watch Mr. Lamb's video below. The recent cap and trade law is very much a reflection of the Agenda 21 policy, adopted during George H. Bush's presidency. The parks policies that Mr. Lamb describes echo the Rockefellers' Adirondack Park in northern New York.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

I am an ignoramus so please explain to me why are American flags flying on the Statue of Liberty? If it was UN territory the UN flag should be flying on it.

Mitchell Langbert said...

From the UN Website at http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/

Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment.

Agenda 21, the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, and the Statement of principles for the Sustainable Management of Forests were adopted by more than 178 Governments at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992.

The Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) was created in December 1992 to ensure effective follow-up of UNCED, to monitor and report on implementation of the agreements at the local, national, regional and international levels. It was agreed that a five year review of Earth Summit progress would be made in 1997 by the United Nations General Assembly meeting in special session.

The plan does not involve any change of government. It involves the US and other governments VOLUNTARILY ceding authority to the UN. This is being done at the local level whereby Towns have been adopting UN-based sustainability principles.

The plan calls for gradual increasing in the level of authority of the sustainability rules. Currently, there are parks in Oklahoma and elsewhere under active UNESCO management.

Mitchell Langbert said...

George H. Bush and the GOP really did the US well. They brought in the UN to tell us how to run our lives. They are true heroes. Traitors to the country.

Anonymous said...

The Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) was created in December 1992 to ensure effective follow-up of UNCED, to monitor and report on implementation of the agreements at the local, national, regional and international levels. It was agreed that a five year review of Earth Summit progress would be made in 1997 by the United Nations General Assembly meeting in special session.

Correct me if I am wrong; but they just monitor the implementation of the agreement. I do not know much about these things but were the Communists not able to monitor the START treaties signed in the 1980's and 1990's. I do not think that we ceded our sovereignty to the Communists as a result of the signing of the START treaties.

By the way; Bush 1 was President in June 1992.

Mitchell Langbert said...

I have heard of eye witness accounts of UNESCO's direct management of World Heritage Sites. I have yet to interview the witnesses directly. But are you certain that monitoring is the sole UNESCO function?

Suppose the eyewitness accounts are wrong. What do you imagine that UNESCO is monitoring? Why would we want them to monitor us? What do we get in return for the monitoring?

Agenda 21 as per the Website (I have yet to receive the publication) says that the treaty is voluntary and by consensus. So why is there monitoring? Are they lying when they say it is by consensus? If not, then what have we agreed to that is involuntary and so requires inspections?

In a nuclear test ban treaty, we give up testing nuclear weapons so that others will also give up testing nuclear weapons. Thus the need for monitoring. It is non-voluntary.

What have we given up and what have we gotten in exchange for having UNESCO "inspectors" inspecting unknown things here in the US? Please clue me in.

Why so little discusson of admission of foreign inspectors onto US soil? Why are they given power to inspect? Is the public aware of this? Please explain. I do not believe Americans are aware of or would choose to have UNESCO monitoring "World Heritage Sites" such as federal parks.

If Agenda 21 is by consensus, why is there so little discussion of it in the media? Who has consented to what?

So I don't get your logic. Plese explain more carefully. What is being inspected? What do we get in return? Why don't Americans know about the inspections? What have we given up?