Friday, December 7, 2012
Why I Do Not Support National Review Conservatism
PO Box 130
West Shokan, New York 12494
December 7, 2012
Mr. J.P. Fowler
215 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10016
Dear Mr. Fowler:
I am in receipt of your fundraising letter of November 30. I did contribute to National Review once or twice, but I have since concluded that the Buckley brand of conservatism has contributed to the nation's ongoing decline. I have two chief reasons for reaching this conclusion.
First, the lesser-of-two-evils voting strategy creates a Hegelian dynamic whereby a left-wing thesis confronts a conservative antithesis. The conservative antithesis is an argument for no change, while the left-wing thesis is an argument for socialist change. The outcome is an incremental socialist (Democratic Party) or fascist (Republican Party) trend, and your lesser-of-two-evils voting philosophy has contributed to it. American conservatism is unique because of William Howard Taft Progressivism, but it still leads to fascism. Instead, there needs to be a pro-freedom thesis, or better yet, an elimination of the Hegelian model altogether because it is superstitious. At this point in history, only a radicalism alien to your Taft conservatism will be successful in reversing the totalitarian trend.
Second, your brand of conservatism does not aim to reduce or even to limit government, despite your and the GOP's protestations. The expansion of government is an outcome of two interactive factors: the brokerage of coalitions of special interests and the unending availability of Federal Reserve Bank counterfeit. The brokerage of coalitions inexorably pushes elected officials to expand government, and the Fed's unlimited monetary expansion power makes expansion possible. You favor the Fed's unfettered monetary creation power, and you do not offer an alternative to democracy's brokerage of special interests, a brokerage recognized and heralded by Herbert Hoover, as William Appleman Williams describes in his Contours of American History.
I have concluded that I have as little common ground with your publication, William Howard Taft Progressivism , the GOP, and neoconservative fascism as I do with the Democratic Party and their more thuggish version of socialism.
Please remove me from your mailing list.
Mitchell Langbert, Ph.D.