|A double top is a bearish signal. The above is the 23-year S&P 500 chart.|
Keynesian economists do not mind their failure because they have tenured jobs in universities and so do not suffer from their own incompetent economic advice, which is helpful to big bankers and the Ochs Sulzbergers, the owners of The New York Times, but harmful to the average American.
I was just reading Murray N. Rothbard's Case Against the Fed. The book was written in 1994, and Rothbard mentions (p. 23) Milton Friedman's use of the "helicopter" metaphor for printing money. Thus, "Helicopter Ben" simply talks as a good Friedmanite monetarist. Rothbard writes:
Milton Friedman's more modern though equally magical version is that of his 'helicopter effect,' in which he postulates that the annual increase of money created by the Federal Reserve is showered on each person proportionately to his current money stock by magical governmental helicopters.
The helicopter analogy is superstition. There is no uniform distribution of printed money. The printed money is handed to hedge fund managers and Wall Street stock jobbers. The distribution of wealth, according to policies of both the Democrats (Paul Krugman) and Republicans (Milton Friedman, Ben Bernanke) is to print money, give it to banks, who give it to Wall Street and the Ochs Sulzbergers, and to Princeton's endowment.
That said, until now I have been optimistic about the stock market because new money boosts it. That is the only reason for long run secular stock market increases (and flattening real hourly wages) that we have seen since 1932 (in the case of wages, 1970). But eventually the inflation from the money printing awakens the public to their having been made poorer by the money printing's not having been distributed by a helicopter but by money center banks who have given it to wealthy Wall Street, real estate and corporate interests and stockholders.
A double top might be signaling that the market expects an inflation. That would force the Fed into tightening, with a resulting stock market collapse. The stagflation of the 1970s required a massive downturn, somewhat larger than the '08-'09 one in terms of unemployment and with much higher inflation. This time, though, after eight decades of economic mismanagement by Washington, by the followers of Keynes and Friedman, the downturn may be worse than the 1970s.
The downturn will be enhanced by the medical system's failure. This will occur on two fronts. First, medical innovation has faltered because of misallocation of investment. Large pharmaceutical firms invest in drugs that have short run return, such as anti-erectile dysfunction drugs. New antibiotics are more difficult. Innovative scientists have much more trouble obtaining capital under Progressivism than under a free market system. Thus, innovation in new directions is squashed by the current monetary system and by Keynesian and monetarist monetary polices and by taxes and regulation. The result is that the past 80 years' vacation from the worst results of infection is coming to an end. Thanks to Democrats and Republicans, thanks to Progressivism and big government, no innovation with respect to anti-infection drugs is on the near term horizon. I hope you enjoyed voting for Democrats and Republicans because having done so will help cause you to die. The baby boomers are the first American generation not to be wealthier than their parents. They will also be the first generation to die younger than their parents.
Second, the medical system has become mismanaged due to government intervention, which has accelerated since 1965. The result is a system that rewards waste. Additional federal intervention in the micro-management of hospitals and physicians' practices will add to the waste.
The situation is as bad with respect to retirement. The boomers have not saved because of the federal income tax, high state property taxes, inflation, especially in areas like education and health care, and low wages. Wages have been artificially low for the past 40 years because of the money printing in which both parties have engaged. The claim that deficit spending stimulates the economy has turned out to be pap. There has been deficit spending for the past 80 years, and the economy is crap. The economics profession, a pack of frauds, and both parties are to blame.
Prior to the abolition of the gold standard real hourly wages went up two percent per year. Since 1970 they have not gone up. But Wall Street has grown exponentially. New York was a manufacturing center until the 1960s. After the abolition of the gold standard in 1970 it became, over 20 years or so, a playground for the super-rich.
So the stock market now shows a double top and the massive monetary expansion which monetarist Bernanke and his Keynesian colleagues believe will provide new antibiotics and an innovative economy has failed. The gold market has reacted predictably. Gold has gone up six-fold in the past 11 years. Silver has gone up more than 10-fold. They are not cheap and seem to be at a rational price given what has been done so far. There is a risk of a commodity market collapse, but there is also a risk of a dollar collapse. Take your pick. Not that I am an advocate of increasing the stock market. The stock market is a measure of profitability, not of human welfare. Firms can be profitable for good reasons, such as innovation, but such reasons are fleeting in a free economy. In general, the stock market goes up because of monetary inflation, that is, money printing.
How can boomers think about retirement when the Democratic and Republican Parties have screwed them financially? Putting your money into risky gold and silver or risky dollar equivalents is hardly an encouraging prospect. The stock market may not do much and may collapse altogether. Thanks to monetarists and Keynesians, the dollar is crap. I hope you've enjoyed the Department of Education and the sub-prime mortgages, because they are ruining your life financially.