Glenda R. McGee sent me a Daily Caller blog about the UN's crackpot Agenda 21, which has caught on in a wide range of US governmental bodies ranging from county environmental departments to the Obama administration. Daily Caller's Jim Simpson points out that the terminology that the radical left and the UN have adopted, such as "sustainability", are code for radical social reorganization along Spartan lines (the Spartans had the kind of collectivist, highly controlled society that today's left advocates, with the Obama-Emanuel youth training movement very much in the Spartan communistic tradition). Daily Caller does a good job of dissecting the code, much of which amounts to fear and loathing of freedom, human happiness and economic progress. Given the environmental movement's staunch opposition to progress and technology, claiming that it is "progressive" is perhaps a worse abuse of language than calling authoritarian left-wingers "liberals."
The notion of "sustainability" is vacuous. A way of life is sustainable if the participants conceive of a way of sustaining it. Technology has proven remarkably inventive not in sustaining but in expanding standards of living. Such expansion has been stalled by the kinds of policies the environmentalists advocate.The chief enemies to sustainability are regulation, government, the Federal Reserve Bank, the United Nations, and authoritarian environmentalism.
As Simpson's article makes clear, UN Agenda 21's land control theme is a form of totalitarian communism that is more radical than Stalin's and Mao's. Environmentalism is a violent totalitarian movement very much in these extremist traditions. Which is not to say that the environment is not an important concern. The rule of law and private property are much better at maintaining the environment optimally than regulation and social reorganization.
It is frightening that the United Nations, which was founded on the premise that it would contribute to world peace, has become an organization that advocates human resettlement and mass murder. It is time for the United States to rethink its involvement in the United Nations. There is a place for a multilateral peace organization, but not for initiatives like UN Agenda 21 and the reactionary environmental movement. The UN should be kicked out of the US, and the US needs to resign from the UN.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I agree with you wholeheartedly. After witnessing atrocities around the world first hand that occur directly in front of UN troops, also with the knowledge of the UN, it sickens me that I have to see, hear and read how the USA sustains these global criminals willingly.
Post a Comment