Seidemann had sued to require that non-members who are violently forced to the agency fee be able to get a refund for the portion of their dues spent for political purposes. Initially the PSC claimed that less than 1% of the dues was used for political purposes. One of Seidemann's former students is now an attorney at the prestigious firm of Jones, Day and he took the case pro bono. Because of a pro-union federal magistrate, the case had to be appealed twice. As the case was appealed, more and more of the union's budget turned out to be devoted to political purposes. When they were still not fully examined, the PSC decided to cut its losses and offered to pay Jones, Day Seidemann's legal fees. By the time they settled, the court had forced the PSC to admit that over 14% of its budget is spent for political purposes. The true amount is even more.
Yet, in a statement to its executive committee, the PSC lied once again and claimed to have won the case.
Sharad Karkhanis asked me to write an article for his Patriot Returns newsletter, which is sent to 13,000 CUNY employees. The newsletter went out this morning. I had asked the PSC to comment on the case, but they did not respond. But this morning, after the newsletter was released, I received an e-mail from Dania