Dan interviewed me last Friday, and the interview aired today. The subject was the United Nations and its Agenda 21, which Olive residents know from the town plan battles of the past few years. The link is http://www.redeemerbroadcasting.org/podcasts/apa_030715_Agenda_21--M_Langbert.mp3
Showing posts with label Sustainable Development. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sustainable Development. Show all posts
Friday, March 6, 2015
My Radio Interview with Dan Elmendorf on Redeemer Broadcasting
My friend Dan Elmendorf, who lives in nearby Olivebridge, runs Redeemer Broadcasting, a Christian radio network that airs locally and in a couple of other states. The stations are FM WFSO Olivebridge, 88.3, Kingston, 105.3 Catskill, 101.1, Newburgh, 90.3 WNEQ, Taylortown, New Jersey 90.3, and WXMD California, Maryland 89.7.
Saturday, April 9, 2011
Sustainable Development Is Code for Authoritarianism
Watch the Conservative Caucus/Conservative Roundtable interview of Tom DeWeese below (h/t patriot 246). Sustainable development is a movement that aims to eliminate property rights and representative government. UN Agenda 21 is a policy that expresses the environmental movement's authoritarian aims. Sustainable development has little to do with conservation in its traditional meaning. Solution: (1) Close UNESCO and end all United Nations involvement with environmental issues. (2) Illegalize UN presence on American soil for any reason other than diplomacy. (3) Boycott firms that advocate sustainability.
Labels:
Sustainable Development,
tom deweese,
UN Agenda 21
Saturday, January 15, 2011
Sustainability Is a Conservative Ideology
The totalitarian left has long disingenuously misapplied words such as liberal, progressive, democratic and rights. Liberal means a supporter of freedom, but the left uses it to mean a supporter of authoritarian state control. Progressive means support for progress, but the left uses it to mean advocacy of policies that squelch progress. Democratic means popular power but the left uses it to mean elite power, especially its own. Rights imply legal protection from violence, but the left uses it to mean the violent attainment of ends of which it approves.
The latest term that the the totalitarian left has corrupted is sustainability. Dictionary.com, defines to sustain as to support or bear the weight of; to keep from giving way; to keep up or keep going, as an action or process; and in a number of other ways. The notion of to keep up or keep going means the same as conserving, which is defined as preventing decay, waste or loss and using natural resources wisely, preserving or saving, as in conserving the woodlands.
The earliest version of environmentalism was called conservation, a term linked to sustainability. Only fools would fail to conserve resources but to make such conservation or sustainability the main point is niggardly. The main point is liberty, on which American culture is based. Liberty may imply conservation or conservatism but more often it has implied improvement, change and progress. Most Americans have come to enjoy the fruit of the experimentation to which liberty has led. Experimentation led to material and spiritual progress, not to conservativsm, reaction and sustainability.
At its heart, the left has always been a conservative movement. It aims to reinstate the tribalism of ancient times and, in the context of today's global society, to do so through re-institution of the medieval world: a global secular church, the United Nations; a federal Empire; a banking aristocracy; and an academic priesthood. The left's reactionary faith is not humanism but sustainability. Human beings are the problem and their eradication, their murder, is its ultimate goal.
Liberty and experimentation lead to discovery. The innovation of new technology permits humanity to improve its standard of living as it uses resources. Discovery permits humanity to make use of new resources in new ways. Human beings do not need to fear scarcity so long as they are free to improve their lives, especially in the context of markets that allocate resources so that they are distributed among their best uses. But if liberty is curtailed, as has occurred here since 1908, experimentation is reduced and progress stalls.
We can do better than sustainability. Sustainability is for the hunting grounds of kings and princes; the backwaters of pre-industrial and ancient societies; for the frontier of 14th century Europe. A nation based on freedom thinks in terms of improvement, progress and growth. It is surely a sign that Progressivism has finally failed that its admitted aim is sustainability and conservation, not progress.
The latest term that the the totalitarian left has corrupted is sustainability. Dictionary.com, defines to sustain as to support or bear the weight of; to keep from giving way; to keep up or keep going, as an action or process; and in a number of other ways. The notion of to keep up or keep going means the same as conserving, which is defined as preventing decay, waste or loss and using natural resources wisely, preserving or saving, as in conserving the woodlands.
The earliest version of environmentalism was called conservation, a term linked to sustainability. Only fools would fail to conserve resources but to make such conservation or sustainability the main point is niggardly. The main point is liberty, on which American culture is based. Liberty may imply conservation or conservatism but more often it has implied improvement, change and progress. Most Americans have come to enjoy the fruit of the experimentation to which liberty has led. Experimentation led to material and spiritual progress, not to conservativsm, reaction and sustainability.
At its heart, the left has always been a conservative movement. It aims to reinstate the tribalism of ancient times and, in the context of today's global society, to do so through re-institution of the medieval world: a global secular church, the United Nations; a federal Empire; a banking aristocracy; and an academic priesthood. The left's reactionary faith is not humanism but sustainability. Human beings are the problem and their eradication, their murder, is its ultimate goal.
Liberty and experimentation lead to discovery. The innovation of new technology permits humanity to improve its standard of living as it uses resources. Discovery permits humanity to make use of new resources in new ways. Human beings do not need to fear scarcity so long as they are free to improve their lives, especially in the context of markets that allocate resources so that they are distributed among their best uses. But if liberty is curtailed, as has occurred here since 1908, experimentation is reduced and progress stalls.
We can do better than sustainability. Sustainability is for the hunting grounds of kings and princes; the backwaters of pre-industrial and ancient societies; for the frontier of 14th century Europe. A nation based on freedom thinks in terms of improvement, progress and growth. It is surely a sign that Progressivism has finally failed that its admitted aim is sustainability and conservation, not progress.
Monday, November 9, 2009
UN Agenda 21 -- Sustainable Development
Glenda McGee just sent me the above video. It seems to me that the step-by-step trend toward increasing government control is leading to communism. This could well be accomplished in the name of environmentalism. The video is right that the illiteracy and innumeracy generated by the public schools facilitates social control and facilitates the march toward extremism. Glenda just forwarded me an article about Maurice Hinchey's plan to make the Hudson River a park. Do we see a pattern?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)