Robert Taylor has called my attention to Bill Warner's blog site. Warner is a private investigator, in other words, a p.i., sherlock, dick, shamus, gumshoe, or flatfoot. I had to mention that.
Warner notes that the Gunny G Blog has been doing some good work regarding the Obama birth certificate. Warner posts a copy of Phil Berg's application to Justice Souter pending resolution of Berg's writ of certiorari:
Philip J. Berg, Esquire,
Petitioner,
vs.
Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., et al,
Respondents.
_____________________
APPLICATION TO JUSTICE DAVID H. SOUTER
FOR AN IMMEDIATE INJUNCTION
TO STAY THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 4, 2008
PENDING RESOLUTION OF THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
_____________________
To the Honorable David H. Souter, Justice of the United States and Circuit
Justice for the Third Circuit:
NOW COMES the Petitioner, Philip J. Berg, Esquire, and pursuant to
United States Supreme Court Rule 23 hereby makes this Application for an
Immediate Injunction to Stay the Presidential Election of November 4, 2008
pending resolution of the Petition for Writ of Certiorari.
Showing posts with label philip j. berg. Show all posts
Showing posts with label philip j. berg. Show all posts
Thursday, November 27, 2008
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Explosive Berg v. Obama Developments
Jim Crum just forwarded this from Judah Benjamin of Texas Darlin
I direct you to America's Right…where Jeff Schreiber has devoted all of his spare time to looking at the case. (Thank you beyond measure, Jeff, I don’t know where you get the time and energy. You are a hero, and Republican, or not, I hope you end up as Chief Justice.) Go to Jeff’s site, I don’t care if he’s a Republican, he’s the man who is in contact with the Court and with Berg and who breaks the news the minute it comes out.
Berg has struck back with a Procedural bombshell!
A motion requesting an immediate order deeming his request for admissions served upon Barack Obama and the DNC on September 15 admitted by default, and
B) A motion requesting an expedited ruling and/or hearing on Berg’s motion deeming the request for admissions served upon Obama and the DNC admitted.
These motions are based on Rule 36 of The Federal Code of Civil Procedure. This Rule, it seems, states that “a party upon whom requests for admissions have been served must respond, within 30 days, or else the matters in the requests will be automatically deemed conclusively admitted for purposes of the pending action.”
Needless to say, Obama and the DNC have NOT made any Legal admissions, or answers to the allegations, at all since September 15th, at least none of which Berg is aware and he should be if they have.
If Judge Surrick grants these motions, Barack Hussein Obama II is, at least temporarily, neither eligible for the Office of POTUS nor a Citizen of the United States, in Law.
Follow the legal developments here and here.
I direct you to America's Right…where Jeff Schreiber has devoted all of his spare time to looking at the case. (Thank you beyond measure, Jeff, I don’t know where you get the time and energy. You are a hero, and Republican, or not, I hope you end up as Chief Justice.) Go to Jeff’s site, I don’t care if he’s a Republican, he’s the man who is in contact with the Court and with Berg and who breaks the news the minute it comes out.
Berg has struck back with a Procedural bombshell!
A motion requesting an immediate order deeming his request for admissions served upon Barack Obama and the DNC on September 15 admitted by default, and
B) A motion requesting an expedited ruling and/or hearing on Berg’s motion deeming the request for admissions served upon Obama and the DNC admitted.
These motions are based on Rule 36 of The Federal Code of Civil Procedure. This Rule, it seems, states that “a party upon whom requests for admissions have been served must respond, within 30 days, or else the matters in the requests will be automatically deemed conclusively admitted for purposes of the pending action.”
Needless to say, Obama and the DNC have NOT made any Legal admissions, or answers to the allegations, at all since September 15th, at least none of which Berg is aware and he should be if they have.
If Judge Surrick grants these motions, Barack Hussein Obama II is, at least temporarily, neither eligible for the Office of POTUS nor a Citizen of the United States, in Law.
Follow the legal developments here and here.
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
Berg Files Motion For Expedited Discovery On Obama Citizenship Case
Americas Right (h/t Bob Robbins) reports that Philip Berg is filing a motion that Senator Barack Hussein Obama and Howard Dean sit for depositions and that the Democratic Party hand over documentation connected with their presidential vetting process, specifically as it concerns Senator Obama's citizenship and eligibility to be president. As well, Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs (h/t Larwyn) links to Obamacrimes, noting that Berg served Obama on September 4 with regard to his case questioning Senator Obama's eligibility to be president. You would have thought the media would have raised these questions, but not even Fox and Bill O'Reilly have avoided spin on the Obama citizenship question. Sean Hannity likes to call Fox an alternative media source, but they have tread carefully with respect to asking hard questions, like "Please give us a hard copy of your birth certificate. Pretty Please?"
America's Right notes that the Berg motion would mandate that Senator Obama hand over his birth certificate; any oath of allegiance; passport records; adoption records; FBI background check; his birth certificate from Kenya; and any and all documents concerning his name changes. I asked for much of that list from various government agencies whose job it is to oversee elections, but who do a dismal job at it, such as Donald McGahan's Federal Election Commission. And these guys want to manage health care? We should outsource the management of the election system. This crew is too incompetent to handle it.
Mr. Berg is certainly to be commended for this suit. The media is avoiding it like the plague. Bill O'Reilly of Fox did not question Mr. Obama about these issues during his mealy-mouthed interview this evening and last week, and Fox is the best media we've got.
America's Right notes that the Berg motion would mandate that Senator Obama hand over his birth certificate; any oath of allegiance; passport records; adoption records; FBI background check; his birth certificate from Kenya; and any and all documents concerning his name changes. I asked for much of that list from various government agencies whose job it is to oversee elections, but who do a dismal job at it, such as Donald McGahan's Federal Election Commission. And these guys want to manage health care? We should outsource the management of the election system. This crew is too incompetent to handle it.
Mr. Berg is certainly to be commended for this suit. The media is avoiding it like the plague. Bill O'Reilly of Fox did not question Mr. Obama about these issues during his mealy-mouthed interview this evening and last week, and Fox is the best media we've got.
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
JJC Corresponds with Philip J. Berg Re Add'l Law Suits
-----Original Message-----
From: philjberg@obamacrimes.com
To: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 5:08 pm
Subject: Re: Illinois Just Says No To Contrairimairi
JJC,
Thank you for you comments. I can tell you the DNC and FEC have been served. We are still awaiting for Confirmation of Service regarding Obama. If you are planning to file suit in another state, please have the attorney call me and I will be happy to assist with the information we have.
Thank you for your email and kind words. Please keep up the great job and continue spreading the word. Together we can make a difference!
Phil
Philip J. Berg, Esquire
obamacrimes.com
Quoting XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
August 25, 2008
Mr. Berg:
I am inquiring about the disposition of the lawsuit placed in PA regarding the legal status and eligibility of Mr. Obama.
This is a challenging endeavor, made even more difficult as the burden of proof exists with the plaintiff. To date, despite many attempts, no information or documentation has been made manifest. So, what should be a trivial issue to resolve, instead has festered through the tool of obfuscation and obstructionism by the Obama campaign into an open sore.
It appears that there is genuine doubt as to the actual truth in this matter. These doubts must be laid to rest as the stakes are simply too high to continue. In the event that his eligibility is removed, it could precipitate a genuine constitutional crisis. No matter what political stripe, we are all Americans, and this risk must be headed off before it can create great difficulty for our nation.
All of this could be resolved with a little transparency, but it seems that will not happen.
Mr. Berg, what is the process to file this petition in other states?
Are there attorneys who would be willing to undertake this project?
JJC.
From: philjberg@obamacrimes.com
To: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 5:08 pm
Subject: Re: Illinois Just Says No To Contrairimairi
JJC,
Thank you for you comments. I can tell you the DNC and FEC have been served. We are still awaiting for Confirmation of Service regarding Obama. If you are planning to file suit in another state, please have the attorney call me and I will be happy to assist with the information we have.
Thank you for your email and kind words. Please keep up the great job and continue spreading the word. Together we can make a difference!
Phil
Philip J. Berg, Esquire
obamacrimes.com
Quoting XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
August 25, 2008
Mr. Berg:
I am inquiring about the disposition of the lawsuit placed in PA regarding the legal status and eligibility of Mr. Obama.
This is a challenging endeavor, made even more difficult as the burden of proof exists with the plaintiff. To date, despite many attempts, no information or documentation has been made manifest. So, what should be a trivial issue to resolve, instead has festered through the tool of obfuscation and obstructionism by the Obama campaign into an open sore.
It appears that there is genuine doubt as to the actual truth in this matter. These doubts must be laid to rest as the stakes are simply too high to continue. In the event that his eligibility is removed, it could precipitate a genuine constitutional crisis. No matter what political stripe, we are all Americans, and this risk must be headed off before it can create great difficulty for our nation.
All of this could be resolved with a little transparency, but it seems that will not happen.
Mr. Berg, what is the process to file this petition in other states?
Are there attorneys who would be willing to undertake this project?
JJC.
Monday, August 25, 2008
Illinois Just Says No to Contrairimairi--JJC Responds
Contrairimairi is trying to clean out the Chicago yards, but Daniel W. White, head of steer on the Illinois dung hill, does not care. Were only HL Mencken alive.
Contrairimairi writes and JJC responds:
>"Please excuse any typos, but I am VERY angry at the moment! Just spoke to "Gary" at the Springfield Board of Elections. I asked when the filing would be for placement on the Illinois presidential ballot. For democrats, it is Aug. 29, 2008. BUT............you must have filed any and all objections to a candidate being placed on the ballot in Oct. or Nov. of LAST YEAR! ( Gary wasn't exactly sure when objections had to have been filed.)
>I asked WHY a person was not removed from office if he was not legally qualified DESPITE the date to file objections. He said it's just the way it is. They do NOT check qualifications, only that petitions are filed legally and then only if there are no objections to the signatures on the petitions!
>We discussed the fact that Hussein may not even be a citizen, and he seemed dumbfounded. He didn't really have an answer to that situation. He said he thought Hussein was born in Hawaii and that was all that mattered. I told him that he was an Indonesian citizen in the 60's, had apparently used his Indonesian passport as an adult, thereby accepting that citizenship, and that there didn't seem to be any record of him ever renouncing that citizenship and taking an oath of citizenship in the U.S. He again seemed dumbfounded.
>My contention with him was, that all information about Hussein has conveniently been "lost" or "sealed" as in the CAC records. He said he had to admit he didn't know anything about Hussein either. I told him, that the question of citizenship has JUST surfaced, and that I believed that no matter where a person was in term of office, if they were found to be holding that office illegally, they needed to be removed! Seems Illinois just doesn't work that way, and he suggested that we seek answers through court filings. He also recommended that we check with our state senator or congressperson.
>I told him I was sick and tired of Illinois being second to the last in shady politics and being the laughing-stock of the rest of the Country. He just had nothing to say. I asked him to please let Dan White know I was VERY angry he had not answered my previous letter.
>Looks like the ONLY way to resolve this matter in Illinois, is to file a case as Mr. Berg has. Illinois apparently makes NO PROVISION to verify the qualifications of ANY candidate here. It IS all a "gentlemanly process" and the public be damned!
>Know any good attorneys in Illinois? Or is that one of those HUGE "oxymorons"?
Mairi
JJC Responds:
>My commentary, for what it is worth:
>1) Illinois protocols are set up in such a way to make challenging a candidate being placed on a ballot rather difficult. Difficult in that it would require considerable lead time, and frankly advance knowledge and planning. Generally this is a good idea as it cuts down on potential chaos as we near elections. For the most part, we are ill served by having last minute filings and challenges that might delay an election.
>2) Berg's action is forceful, but only time will tell us what traction it will get.
>3) If someone has contact information, perhaps a question can be posed to Mr. Berg, to see if the filing can be duplicated in other states and ask for suggestions. I do not know of any attorneys who would be capable or willing to handle this, or I would have asked by now.
>4) Hence, perhaps a letter with the filings be copied and forwarded to the State of Illinois minority (GOP) leader. Keep in mind, these guys are sometimes part of the problem as well, and some are cowed by the crowd in Chicago.
>Ultimately, the Berg lawsuit has to be made known to the voters. The allegations, as fantastic as they might seem, as expressed in that piece of litigation have to be determined.
For the record, Mr. Berg's website is at http://obamacrimes.com/ and his e-mail is at philjberg@obamacrimes.com.
Philip J. Berg responds:
philjberg@obamacrimes.com
mlangbert@hvc.rr.com
Subject: Date: Monday, August 25, 2008 6:24 PM
Re: Illinois Just Says No To Contrairimairi Size: 2 KB
Priority: Normal
Thank you for contacting us.
We are receiving an overwhelming number of emails and ask for your patience.
We will respond as quickly as possible.
Contrairimairi writes and JJC responds:
>"Please excuse any typos, but I am VERY angry at the moment! Just spoke to "Gary" at the Springfield Board of Elections. I asked when the filing would be for placement on the Illinois presidential ballot. For democrats, it is Aug. 29, 2008. BUT............you must have filed any and all objections to a candidate being placed on the ballot in Oct. or Nov. of LAST YEAR! ( Gary wasn't exactly sure when objections had to have been filed.)
>I asked WHY a person was not removed from office if he was not legally qualified DESPITE the date to file objections. He said it's just the way it is. They do NOT check qualifications, only that petitions are filed legally and then only if there are no objections to the signatures on the petitions!
>We discussed the fact that Hussein may not even be a citizen, and he seemed dumbfounded. He didn't really have an answer to that situation. He said he thought Hussein was born in Hawaii and that was all that mattered. I told him that he was an Indonesian citizen in the 60's, had apparently used his Indonesian passport as an adult, thereby accepting that citizenship, and that there didn't seem to be any record of him ever renouncing that citizenship and taking an oath of citizenship in the U.S. He again seemed dumbfounded.
>My contention with him was, that all information about Hussein has conveniently been "lost" or "sealed" as in the CAC records. He said he had to admit he didn't know anything about Hussein either. I told him, that the question of citizenship has JUST surfaced, and that I believed that no matter where a person was in term of office, if they were found to be holding that office illegally, they needed to be removed! Seems Illinois just doesn't work that way, and he suggested that we seek answers through court filings. He also recommended that we check with our state senator or congressperson.
>I told him I was sick and tired of Illinois being second to the last in shady politics and being the laughing-stock of the rest of the Country. He just had nothing to say. I asked him to please let Dan White know I was VERY angry he had not answered my previous letter.
>Looks like the ONLY way to resolve this matter in Illinois, is to file a case as Mr. Berg has. Illinois apparently makes NO PROVISION to verify the qualifications of ANY candidate here. It IS all a "gentlemanly process" and the public be damned!
>Know any good attorneys in Illinois? Or is that one of those HUGE "oxymorons"?
Mairi
JJC Responds:
>My commentary, for what it is worth:
>1) Illinois protocols are set up in such a way to make challenging a candidate being placed on a ballot rather difficult. Difficult in that it would require considerable lead time, and frankly advance knowledge and planning. Generally this is a good idea as it cuts down on potential chaos as we near elections. For the most part, we are ill served by having last minute filings and challenges that might delay an election.
>2) Berg's action is forceful, but only time will tell us what traction it will get.
>3) If someone has contact information, perhaps a question can be posed to Mr. Berg, to see if the filing can be duplicated in other states and ask for suggestions. I do not know of any attorneys who would be capable or willing to handle this, or I would have asked by now.
>4) Hence, perhaps a letter with the filings be copied and forwarded to the State of Illinois minority (GOP) leader. Keep in mind, these guys are sometimes part of the problem as well, and some are cowed by the crowd in Chicago.
>Ultimately, the Berg lawsuit has to be made known to the voters. The allegations, as fantastic as they might seem, as expressed in that piece of litigation have to be determined.
For the record, Mr. Berg's website is at http://obamacrimes.com/ and his e-mail is at philjberg@obamacrimes.com.
Philip J. Berg responds:
philjberg@obamacrimes.com
mlangbert@hvc.rr.com
Subject: Date: Monday, August 25, 2008 6:24 PM
Re: Illinois Just Says No To Contrairimairi Size: 2 KB
Priority: Normal
Thank you for contacting us.
We are receiving an overwhelming number of emails and ask for your patience.
We will respond as quickly as possible.
Friday, August 22, 2008
Pennsylvania Attorney Sues to Remove Obama Candidacy
Philip J. Berg (also see Texas Darlin), a Lafayette Hill and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania attorney and former deputy attorney general, has filed a law suit ( Berg vs. Obama, Civil Action No. 08-cv-4083)questioning Mr. Obama's candidacy on three grounds:
1. he is not a natural born citizen
2. he lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia and
3. he has dual loyalties because of citizenship in Kenya or Indonesia.
Questions Berg raises in his press release include:
Where was Obama born? Hawaii; an island off of Hawaii; Kenya; Canada; or ?
2. Was he a citizen of Kenya, Indonesia and/or Canada?
3. What was the early childhood of Obama in Hawaii; in Kenya; in Indonesia when he was adopted; and later, back to Hawaii?
4. An explanation as to the various names utilized by Obama that include: Barack Hussein Obama; Barry Soetoro; Barry Obama; Barack Dunham; and Barry Dunham.
5. Illinois Bar Application – Obama fails to acknowledge use of names other than Barack Hussein Obama, a blatant lie.
Berg's complaint is here.
On Saturday morning I heard Berg on the George Noory show that runs at 1:00 AM. Several bloggers have pointed out that Berg is previously associated with a 9/11 conspiracy suit, which is a drawback. But it is great that someone has taken the initiative to file a lawsuit as this is certainly one way that the various documentation questions that Andy Martin, Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs, Texas Darlin and Larry Johnson of No Quarter USA have raised.
I sent Mr. Berg the following e-mail:
----- Original Message -----
From: Mitchell Langbert
To: philjberg@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 10:47 PM
Subject: Fw: Obama Birth Certificate I sent FEC Petition with 5,400 signatures on Monday
Dear Mr. Berg-- I had forwarded a petition with 5,400 signatures on Monday asking the FEC to investigate Mr. Obama's birth certificate. I just heard about your upcoming appearance on the radio and your press release via a source in Washington. I would be delighted to assist you in your effort. I have listed some of the urls relevant to what I have done below. My phone number is xxx-xxx-xxxx (Woodstock, NY area). Best wishes, Mitchell Langbert, Ph.D.
1. he is not a natural born citizen
2. he lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia and
3. he has dual loyalties because of citizenship in Kenya or Indonesia.
Questions Berg raises in his press release include:
Where was Obama born? Hawaii; an island off of Hawaii; Kenya; Canada; or ?
2. Was he a citizen of Kenya, Indonesia and/or Canada?
3. What was the early childhood of Obama in Hawaii; in Kenya; in Indonesia when he was adopted; and later, back to Hawaii?
4. An explanation as to the various names utilized by Obama that include: Barack Hussein Obama; Barry Soetoro; Barry Obama; Barack Dunham; and Barry Dunham.
5. Illinois Bar Application – Obama fails to acknowledge use of names other than Barack Hussein Obama, a blatant lie.
Berg's complaint is here.
On Saturday morning I heard Berg on the George Noory show that runs at 1:00 AM. Several bloggers have pointed out that Berg is previously associated with a 9/11 conspiracy suit, which is a drawback. But it is great that someone has taken the initiative to file a lawsuit as this is certainly one way that the various documentation questions that Andy Martin, Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs, Texas Darlin and Larry Johnson of No Quarter USA have raised.
I sent Mr. Berg the following e-mail:
----- Original Message -----
From: Mitchell Langbert
To: philjberg@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 10:47 PM
Subject: Fw: Obama Birth Certificate I sent FEC Petition with 5,400 signatures on Monday
Dear Mr. Berg-- I had forwarded a petition with 5,400 signatures on Monday asking the FEC to investigate Mr. Obama's birth certificate. I just heard about your upcoming appearance on the radio and your press release via a source in Washington. I would be delighted to assist you in your effort. I have listed some of the urls relevant to what I have done below. My phone number is xxx-xxx-xxxx (Woodstock, NY area). Best wishes, Mitchell Langbert, Ph.D.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
