Showing posts with label dba. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dba. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
DBA versus GLD
The top chart shows the historical trend of the agricultural index exchange traded fund (ETF) Deutsche Bank Agricultural Index, DBA and the bottom chart shows GLD since late 2005. The DBA chart had a double top two years ago just prior to the crash of '08. Double tops are a classic technical signal of an impending decline, and it worked in the case of DBA. I googled the DBA and found a few technicians commenting on it to the effect that it has been/is a weak stock because of the double top two years ago. Note the contrast with GLD, which has had a relatively steady upward trend, having taken a small double top and dip during the '08 roller coaster but recovering quickly and profoundly.
I have a problem with that combination of facts, though. If gold is going up it is because of monetary demand, that is, people want to use gold to save instead of dollars, then people anticipate inflation and therefore DBA should go up. If gold demand has a logical foundation, then inflation is impending. If inflation is impending, then agricultural prices should be going up. This is especially true because the inflation has been caused by over-investment in real estate due to Federal Reserve and commercial banking's counterfeiting money and then investing the proceeds in politically favored industries, namely construction and real estate. To expand investment real estate, the supply of agricultural land had to be reduced. Hence, there would seem to be upward pressure on food prices. Last week DBA went up six percent in one day. Since June, when DBA hit its low, it has gone up 28%, from $22.85 to $28.52.
The technicians may underestimate the effect of the underlying process of monetary inflation on long term food prices. I bought DBA about two years ago and I'm up about 12%. The DBA has underperformed both gold and the stock market during that period. It may be subject to further downward fluctuations (the technicians have asserted this until recently) but given the recent trend it may be that the lean years are coming to an end for DBA.
Labels:
commodity investing,
dba,
gld,
gold,
gold investing
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Unstoppable Force Versus Immovable Object: Road To $6500 Gold Paved with Failing Economic News
Kitco has some excellent commentaries. Darryl R. Schoon discusses the likelihood of a meltdown in the dollar. He argues that the 1971 devaluation of the dollar and removal of the international dollar from the gold standard led to a fiat currency. He claims that traditionally fiat currencies last about 40 years, and we are now 40 years into the paper dollar regime. The result has been trade imbalances, exodus of manufacturing from the US, and inflation. The paper dollar will become worthless in his view and the reverse will occur for hard assets. The collapsing dollar will lead to volatility and the markets will find a stable replacement for the dollar, likely gold or silver. He predicts $3,000 to $10,000 gold. He also argues that gold is no more volatile than tech stocks. Schoon claims that there are five stages of a gold bubble and we are in the fourth stage, where there is increased volatility.
Although I don't put much faith in the Fed or Chairman Bernanke, his message suggests volatility indeed. Before I summarize his speech as depicted in Bloomberg, notice that silver has lagged gold and that commodities like agriculture and the general commodity index have not increased to the same degree. One claim may be that current demand for gold is caused by its monetary qualities, that some investors are now viewing gold as money. However, it is also true that the dollar has gone through a period, in my opinion a temporary period, of strengthening. The dollar has gotten stronger because of risk aversion directed toward the global credit and banking collapse (especially including Greece, Portugal and Spain) and because of the collapse in bubble credit here in the US.
Bernanke's talk today as reported in Bloomberg led to nearly a one percent fall in the Dow and the S&P 500. Bernanke indicates that the Fed is planning to raise interest rates, which will have a depressing effect on the stock market. Bloomberg quotes Dean Maki, chief US economist at Barclay's Capital:
"'The Fed is not close to implementing additional stimulus.' Expectations for additional steps were based on 'more hope than fact.'"
There is little doubt that the Fed will keep interest rates close to zero. But continued weakness in the economy creates a logical problem. If the Fed stimulates inflation increases. Stimulus also fuels the short-run gold price. Bernanke aims to begin reducing the amount of stimulus to avoid these risks. But he risks further increasing unemployment. The unstoppable monetary collapse meets the unmovable decline in the US economy.
Mr. Schoon is right that in the long term the current monetary regime will fail. However, international risk and a weak economy suggest a short term strengthening of the dollar. This could mean fluctuations of gold of 50% or more. Ultimately, though, the Fed's "printing press" will cause the dollar to crash. This will result in increasing commodity prices.
If you are worried about long term monetary instability, commodities other than gold might be better holdings right now. For example, the DBC, Dunn & Bradstreet Commodity Index and the DBA, Dun & Bradstreet Agricultural Index, have hardly risen since 2008. Moreover, silver, which can be purchased through SLV, the I-Shares silver trust, can be purchased to take advantage of silver's monetary characteristics. The claim that gold's price increase is due to its monetary characteristics rather than short term speculation is contradicted by the relative lag in silver's price increase. If you are hedging for a monetary skid or collapse, SLV might be a better bet than gold for now.
Over time gold will go up. But if you can buy it at $950 why buy at $1180?
Although I don't put much faith in the Fed or Chairman Bernanke, his message suggests volatility indeed. Before I summarize his speech as depicted in Bloomberg, notice that silver has lagged gold and that commodities like agriculture and the general commodity index have not increased to the same degree. One claim may be that current demand for gold is caused by its monetary qualities, that some investors are now viewing gold as money. However, it is also true that the dollar has gone through a period, in my opinion a temporary period, of strengthening. The dollar has gotten stronger because of risk aversion directed toward the global credit and banking collapse (especially including Greece, Portugal and Spain) and because of the collapse in bubble credit here in the US.
Bernanke's talk today as reported in Bloomberg led to nearly a one percent fall in the Dow and the S&P 500. Bernanke indicates that the Fed is planning to raise interest rates, which will have a depressing effect on the stock market. Bloomberg quotes Dean Maki, chief US economist at Barclay's Capital:
"'The Fed is not close to implementing additional stimulus.' Expectations for additional steps were based on 'more hope than fact.'"
There is little doubt that the Fed will keep interest rates close to zero. But continued weakness in the economy creates a logical problem. If the Fed stimulates inflation increases. Stimulus also fuels the short-run gold price. Bernanke aims to begin reducing the amount of stimulus to avoid these risks. But he risks further increasing unemployment. The unstoppable monetary collapse meets the unmovable decline in the US economy.
Mr. Schoon is right that in the long term the current monetary regime will fail. However, international risk and a weak economy suggest a short term strengthening of the dollar. This could mean fluctuations of gold of 50% or more. Ultimately, though, the Fed's "printing press" will cause the dollar to crash. This will result in increasing commodity prices.
If you are worried about long term monetary instability, commodities other than gold might be better holdings right now. For example, the DBC, Dunn & Bradstreet Commodity Index and the DBA, Dun & Bradstreet Agricultural Index, have hardly risen since 2008. Moreover, silver, which can be purchased through SLV, the I-Shares silver trust, can be purchased to take advantage of silver's monetary characteristics. The claim that gold's price increase is due to its monetary characteristics rather than short term speculation is contradicted by the relative lag in silver's price increase. If you are hedging for a monetary skid or collapse, SLV might be a better bet than gold for now.
Over time gold will go up. But if you can buy it at $950 why buy at $1180?
Labels:
Ben Bernanke,
darryl r. schoon,
dba,
dbc,
Fed,
gold investing,
silver
Thursday, June 3, 2010
Is the Ride to $3,000 Gold Going to Hit Air Pockets?
The graphs above are of the Power Shares DB Commodity Index (DBC) which tracks sweet crude oil, heating oil, RBOB Gasoline, natural gas, brent crude, gold, silver, aluminum, zinc, copper grade A, corn, wheat, soybeans, and sugar; the Power Shares DB Agricultural Index, (DBA) which tracks corn, wheat, soy beans and sugar; and GLD, the SPDR gold trust, which tracks gold. On May 28 Smart Trend.com reported that the agricultural index is in a bearish trend.
As you can see in the charts above, the DBC and DBA peaked in 2008 and have stayed off their peaks, while GLD, the third graph, has risen consistently.
Personally, I have no more faith in the word of the US Congress than I do in the word of a three card Monty dealer on 42nd Street. Given the massive increases in deficits under President Obama and the even more massive increase in the monetary base in 2008 (and consistent increases in the US money supply ) there is no reason to think that gold and commodities will do anything but increase over many years. Ultimately, speculation and replacement of the dollar with gold by frenzied Americans trying to escape the government's legal tender law will push up the gold price further.
But gold has increased almost five-fold since 2001, while other commodities have not kept place and have significantly fallen since 2008. A general rule is to buy low and sell high. It is possible that the gold market is more rational than other commodities because industrial demand is greater for oil, food and other metals than for gold. But it is just as possible that it is less rational because gold is subject to romance and speculation. The other commodities tell a story different from gold.
Gold is going up because of speculation in anticipation of inflation, and if there is inflation then the other commodities will go up as well. Also, hyper-inflation might mean a two-fold increase in prices, but gold has already gone up five-fold.
I do not doubt that gold will continue to go up. But if there were shortages in gold due to insufficient production in the 1990s, there ought to have been shortages in other commodities as well. Hence, in the long run I wager that there will be continued speculation in gold and that when inflation takes off there will be a gold bubble. But I would think that other commodities where there is less speculation, romance and publicity are more reliable investments at this time. When inflation starts, many will flock to gold, but the ride can be bumpy because there is speculation in the gold market.
Let's say the Fed decides to increase interest rates. There will likely be declines in the stock market, but gold could be even harder hit. Over time the price will come back, but I find it hard to believe that without a concomitant increase in other commodities' prices the gold price will continue a secular increase. The reasoning for buying gold is that gold is a hedge against inflation, but so are the DBC and the DBA, and they haven't increased for two years. So if I were buying commodities now I would buy those and hold off on the gold.
According to Thoughts.com the dollar ought to be worth .7734 ounces of silver. Today silver sells for $17.95 and gold sells for $1,207 per ounce. Thus, the dollar is worth .0557 ounces of silver, 0.3% of the level at which the Coinage Act of 1792 defined it. If you think the decline in value was directed into the hands of the middle class, which William Greider claims in his book Secrets of the Temple, you're on drugs. The money is created by banks who collect interest and they lend it to speculators, hedge funds, corporations and most of all, Wall Street. As well, it boosts stock prices because low interest rates increase the present value of future earnings. Left wingers like Greider, who advocate Keynsianism, like to avoid discussing how their ideas support Wall Street and the banking lobby.
The additional money causes inflation, raising prices for everyone. Hence, it harms those who do not own stocks and real estate and are not bankers and helps those whose entire livelihood comes from stocks and real estate. The middle class gets something back through increasing house prices, but those who save and work hard are penalized in favor of those who borrow. Hence, it makes everyone poorer as the public learns that invention, innovation, hard work and creativity are for suckers, and borrowing to buy a condo is how to make a living.
The inflationary economy and the triumph of the left in terms of three card Monty government means that America's prospects are much worse than they've been. A collapse of the financial and monetary system would seem to be a possibility. Hence, gold and silver are good bets. But I'm going to buy when they fall.
Labels:
commodity investing,
dba,
dbc,
gold investing,
inflation,
powershares,
stock market,
stocks
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)