Showing posts with label Albany. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Albany. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Carl Paladino on Sheldon Silver



-----Original Message-----
From: Carl Paladino
To: Carl Paladino
Sent: Wed, Sep 5, 2012 7:36 pm
Subject: Sheldon Silver and the New York State Press a/k/a Wimps
Obviously you are not disposed to call for Sheldon 
Silver's resignation or even a Federal investigation 
of his corruption.  After all, he only embezzled 
$103,000 from the State treasury and in the context 
of his other high crimes and misdemeanors, what's the 
big deal?   Silver was only doing what he has always 
done.  He was bailing out his buddy Vito Lopez.  After 
all he is Sheldon Silver, the guy who wrote the book on 
intimidating the press with the denial of access.  Just 
ask Liz Benjamin and Jim Vielkind.  Is there no one in 
the spineless press who has the cohunes to stand up to 
this diabolic scoundrel?
 
Considering Silver's past, the press should be asking 
if it was quiet money to keep Vito's mouth shut about 
other topics?  We'll probably never know the answer to 
that because the press will let the good old Albany 
establishment boys bury the issue with a Special 
Prosecutor investigation that will go on forever 
and result in nothing.  Whenever politicians want 
to bury an issue they appoint a Special  Committee or 
Prosecutor.  
 
Silver acknowledged  "a mistake was made."  Was it an 
intentional mistake?  The confidentiality clause, his 
long history of making such "mistakes" and the BS that 
other elected officials knew lead one to believe that 
it was an intentional and unforgivable mistake.   
What more do you need to demand his resignation?   
 
Silver is a poster child for term limits.  18 years 
of intimidation, arrogance, illusion and theatrics 
that the establishment boys call "skill."  He rules 
the entire State government with an iron fist.  We'll 
never see Tort, Malpractice or Workers Comp reform 
while he's there.  He gets a load of 
money from his personal injury law firm, and under 
the rules he has written, he is not required to 
disclose it.  We'll never see reform of the Wick's law, 
Taylor Law or Tri-borough Amendment which punish the 
taxpayers with mind boggling costs.  We'll also 
never see initiative and referendum which would 
give the taxpayers a real voice in their government.   
Silver thinks that three men in a room with one 
alpha dog works good for him. 
 
Mike Gormley's expert from someplace else tells us that 
Silver is out of the weeds because all his actions were 
known to the Comptroller and Attorney General.  What 
Mike didn't say is that both of them owe their jobs to 
Sheldon Silver and have been his puppets for years.  That 
doesn't work for the people Mike.   The "Joint Commission 
on Public Ethics" was personally picked by Silver.  That 
also doesn't work for the people Mike.
  
We know the press is just peachy with things as they are.  
The status quo suits you so well because it keeps the 
taxpayers dumbed down and cheap brainless staff keep your 
profit margins up.  You can sell the people of New York just 
about any garbage.  They eat it up.  They accept mediocrity 
and failure because the press has told them that they can't 
do anything about it.  Those who can get out.  Meanwhile 
guys like Silver keep the entitlements rich to bring more 
dregs to New York to enhance the effort for a permanent 
democratic majority.  Silver recently showed just how 
far he has gone off the reservation by proposing that New 
York State taxpayers give financial aid to educate any 
illegal in America.  Who wants to stick around to pay 
for that burden?
 
Corruption is rampant in Albany because Shelly Silver is 
not only involved and complicit but he also protects the 
criminality of his followers when one of his bottom fish 
gets caught with dirty hands.  
 
Silver's attitude has now evolved to the absurd.  He 
alone can violate the rules of the Assembly and disburse 
taxpayer money with impunity and without prior consultation 
or approval.  He uses taxpayer money to ensure loyalty.  What 
possible theory could justify the use of taxpayer money to 
resolve a sexual harassment allegation?  What other actions 
of this man will raise the red flag?  Why is a downstate 
District Attorney, who associates with the good old boy 
establishment RINO's, selected as the Special Prosecutor 
instead of a more objective upstate DA who would be less 
inclined to belabor the proper dissection of an 18 year 
career of arrogant larceny and intimidation.  If anyone 
else embezzled $103,000 the press would be calling for 
the construction of a gallows prior to giving him or her 
a fair trial.
 
The question is why is this particular government 
official above the law.  For anyone else in government 
it would be embezzlement.  For Shelly it's just another 
day of taking care of his friends and family club.   
 
The press could get by its cowardly image if it followed 
its role model,NY Times, and jumped at this opportunity 
to take down the man that even his friends refer to as the 
demon. 
 
Silver is vengeful and his retaliation is unmerciful.  For 
me, as the greater fool, it's a call to arms. For spineless 
cowards like the editors and reporters (and publishers) of 
the New York State press it would be an earth-shattering 
bold change of policy.  It would require actual research and 
a major effort to connect the dots and we all know the 
reluctance of the Albany press corps [Tom Precious of the 
Buffalo News included.]   They don't like controversy and 
are only capable of tweaking up feel good press releases.   
 
Here in Buffalo there would probably be a big problem for 
Stan Lipsey who's friends and family club members Jordan 
Levy and Howard Zemsky may be found on Silver's dance 
card when the Feds start following the money.  Do they do 
each other big favors?  Are investment tips the quid pro 
quo for handsome multi-million dollar subsidies from the 
taxpayers for their projects?  The money comes from one 
of Shelly's "off the books" vehicles like his private 
stash of taxpayer cash which some refer to as the 
Dormitory Authority.  
 
He who lives by the sword will die by the sword.
 
If you agree with the above, forward it to your 
friends and family.

Wednesday, February 6, 2008

Then and Now

"The doings of the last Legislature at Albany have been shocking--far worse than appears in the papers, and I fear there is little hope of reform from the regular politicians. They are all banded together for plunder, no matter how much difference of opinion they may effect...If the country is to be saved and purified, it must be by some force outside their ranks..."

--Edwin Lawrence Godkin, founder and editor of the Nation and editor of the New York Evening Post
Letter to Charles Eliot Norton, April 23, 1867
William K. Armstrong, editor, The Gilded Age Letters of E.L. Godkin,, p. 103
Albany, NY 1974: SUNY Press

Sunday, February 3, 2008

New York Giants Win Superbowl XLII


Eli Manning has led the Giants to what the Kansas City Star calls "among the greatest upsets in the history of professional team sports." Wide receiver David Tyree made the catch of the century and Plaxico Burress caught a 13-yard touchdown pass. I'm not a regular football fan, but this game's edge-of-the-seat, spectacular fourth quarter (at least for us New Yorkers) got me interested.

Now, might some other folks in New York throw some upset passes? How about Eliot Spitzer eliminating New York State's income tax? How about a 20% across the board reduction in Albany's general fund budget next year? How about a real celebration?

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

ABOR Bill Referred to Higher Ed Committee in Albany

When Phil Orenstein and I met with aides to several state senators last summer I did not expect to see an actual bill proposed in the State Senate this legislative session. The following bill, S. 6336, has been proposed by Senators DeFRANCISCO, GOLDEN, JOHNSON, LARKIN, MALTESE, MEIER, MORAHAN, PADAVAN, TRUNZO, and WINNER. It is an important step for academic freedom in New York and in the nation. If the New York State Senate can propose ABOR, the rest of the country definitely can pass it.

Introduced by Sens. DeFRANCISCO, GOLDEN, JOHNSON, LARKIN,
MALTESE,
MEIER, MORAHAN, PADAVAN, TRUNZO -- read twice and ordered
printed, and
when printed to be committed to the Committee on Higher Education

AN ACT to amend the education law, in relation to creating an
academic
bill of rights

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and
Assem-
bly, do enact as follows:

1 Section 1. The education law is amended by adding a new section
224-b
2 to read as follows:
3 § 224-b. Academic bill of rights. 1. A student enrolled in an
institu-
4 tion of higher education has the right to expect:
5 a. A learning environment in which the student has access to a
broad
6 range of serious scholarly opinion pertaining to the subjects
the
7 student studies in which, in the humanities, the social sciences
and the
8 arts, the fostering of a plurality of serious scholarly
methodologies
9 and perspectives has a significant institutional purpose;
10 b. To be graded solely on the basis of the student's reasoned
answers
11 and appropriate knowledge of the subjects the student studies and
to not
12 be discriminated against on the basis of the student's
political or
13 religious beliefs;
14 c. That the student's academic freedom and the quality of
education
15 will not be infringed upon by instructors who persistently
introduce
16 controversial matter into the classroom or coursework that
has no
17 relation to the subject of study and that serves no legitimate
pedagog-
18 ical purpose;
19 d. That the freedom of speech, freedom of expression,
freedom of
20 assembly and freedom of conscience of students and student
organizations
21 are not infringed upon by administrators, student government
organiza-
22 tions or institutional policies, rules or procedures; and
23 e. That the student's academic institution distributes student
fee
24 funds on a viewpoint-neutral basis and maintains a posture of
neutrality
25 with respect to substantive political and religious
disagreements,
26 differences and opinions.

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in
brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.

LBD13937-01-5



S. 6336 2

1 2. A faculty member or instructor at an institution of higher
educa-
2 tion has the right to expect:
3 a. Academic freedom in the classroom in discussing subjects
while
4 making the students aware of serious scholarly viewpoints other
than
5 that of the faculty member or instructor and encouraging
intellectual
6 honesty, civil debate and the critical analysis of ideas in the
pursuit
7 of knowledge and truth;
8 b. To be hired, fired, promoted, denied promotion, granted
tenure or
9 denied tenure on the basis of competence and appropriate
knowledge in
10 the field of expertise of the faculty member or instructor and
not on
11 the basis of political or religious beliefs; and
12 c. To not be excluded from tenure, search and hiring committees
on the
13 basis of political or religious beliefs.
14 3. An institution of higher education shall fully inform
students,
15 faculty and instructors of the rights under this section and
of the
16 institution's grievance procedures for violations of academic
freedom by
17 notices prominently displayed in course catalogs or student
handbooks
18 and on the institutional publicly accessible site on the Internet.
19 4. The governing board of an institution of higher education
shall
20 develop institutional guidelines and policies to protect the
academic
21 freedom and the rights of students and faculty under this
section and
22 shall adopt a grievance procedure by which a student or faculty
member
23 may seek redress of grievance for an alleged violation of a right
speci-
24 fied in this section. A governing board under this subdivision
shall
25 publicize the grievance procedure developed pursuant to this
subdivision
26 to the students and faculty on every campus that is under the
control
27 and direction of the governing board.
28 § 2. This act shall take effect immediately.






NEW YORK STATE SENATE
INTRODUCER'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT
submitted in accordance with Senate Rule VI. Sec 1



BILL NUMBER: S6336

SPONSOR: DEFRANCISCO
TITLE OF BILL:

An act to amend the education law, in relation to creating an academic
bill of rights
PURPOSE:

To ensure that students enrolled in institutions of higher education
receive exposure to a wide range of scholarly viewpoints, and to recog-
nize the academic rights of faculty members.
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:

Section 224-b (1) -- Outlines what a student enrolled at a higher educa-
tional institution can expect. Included in this portion of the bill are
provisions stating that a student can expect to be graded solely on the
basis of his/her work, student fee money should be distributed in a fair
manner, and a student's freedom of conscience shall not be infringed
upon by administrators or student government organizations.

Section 224-b (2) -- Outlines what a faculty member has a right to
expect. Included in this portion is a provision requiring that faculty
be hired, fired, or promoted on the merits of their work and not on
their political or religious beliefs.

Section 224-b (3) -- Higher education institutions are required to
inform students of their rights and of the institution's grievance
procedures for violations of academic freedom.

Section 224-b (4) -- The governing board of a higher education institu-
tion is required to develop and publicize a grievance procedure for
violations of academic freedom.
JUSTIFICATION:

Every institution of higher learning has a duty to promote intellectual
diversity on campus. Too often, students find many college classes
biased or one-sided. The ideas of all students and faculty members
should be treated with respect, and all ideas deserve to be represented
on campus.

Professors and administrators have an obligation to make students aware
of a broad range of viewpoints and perspectives. They are not hired to
teach only students who share their political or philosophical views,
and professors should never force their own views upon their students.
The classroom is not and should never be a soapbox for a professor to
promote his or her point of view.

The Academic Bill of Rights has been introduced as legislation in a
number of state legislatures, and a few states have already adopted a
form of the Academic Bill of Rights. In one of the most recent examples,
the Pennsylvania State House of Representatives -- in July 2005 --
passed a resolution supporting the principles of the Academic Bill of
Rights.
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:
New bill.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

None.
LOCAL FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

None.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
Immediately.