I just received this e-mail from Mairi of Chicago:
>I watched last night, as word came down that a deal had been reached to extend the 2011 budget. To say I was disappointed would be an understatement. I was ENRAGED!
Carl Cameron gave his view of what had happened, and I have to tell you, I have despised that man since he leaked the stories of Sarah Palin being attacked by staff members of John McCain's candidacy as a "diva". The man is a jackanapes, IMHO...
Personally, I have had it with the GOP. They are just DemocRATS on quaaludes. They have tried to convince the American public each time they caved in and passed a CR, that they were gaining in spending cuts with each new resolution.....unfortunately, the amount of spending so far overshadowed any supposed cuts, those CR's were rendered eunuchs. There was no victory in their passage.
And now we come to last night's marathon negotiations. Republican cronies tried to place such a happy spin on what had occurred, claiming that never before in history had so many spending cuts been accomplished. Fact of the matter is, never before in history has America ever been faced with such enormous debt that even our grandchildren and great grandchildren will be devastated by it's effects. The global economy is teetering on the brink, and if America falls, NO ONE SURVIVES the consequences.
There is no "happy spin" on what happened last night in the Capital. Republicans caved. They blinked, their knees knocked, and DemocRATS took full advantage.
I am FINISHED with Republicans. I am finished with the likes of Michele Bachmann and Allen West, Rand Paul and Jason Chaffetz. They sound so on the side of the American people, but fact of the matter is, not one of them has stood tall on the eligibility issue, or LtC. Terry Lakin. They can claim all they want that they value the Tea Party and all the principles and virtues of Constitutionality that it embraces, but as I see it, they are just party hacks taking advantage of an opportunity. I am pleased that they voted "no" to the deal, but that is negated by the outcome. Not one has the cajones to LEAD!
In the future, I will be looking to alternative parties like the AIP and the Constitution Party to begin picking up the slack with candidates who know, understand, and revere our Constitution. It's time for the former Whig party to consider a comeback, or even possibly the Tea Party becoming just that, a new "Party". Those in the future who claim affiliation with Republican or DemocRATS will not gain my support. I really felt confident after last November that Republicans could not only be led to the water, but would actually drink. They, IMHO, have refused. They have no concern for the Constitution, and the fact that they caved so easily, without a threatened government shut-down so welcomed by the American people this time around, is all the evidence I needed to convince me, that while these two parties exist in D.C, nothing will ever change for the better.
I HOPE everyone is signed up for GOOOH.com, and will familiarize yourselves with ALL of the "alternative" parties which embrace the Constitution. I consider the best to be, "the American Independent Party", "the Constitution Party", and probably at this point, even Libertarians.
I am open to suggestions from any of you.........2012 will be here before we know it, and it's time to have Constitutionalists in the forefront. There are GREAT candidates already waiting for the opportunity to have your support, like John Dummett, who has been trying to gain support and recognition for some time now. It behooves us to become familiar with real candidates who need our support to win against the Reps' and Dems' power brokers and money. It will be important to identify Constitutionalists, make others very aware, and build enough awareness that these candidates WILL prevail. I have Faith after last November that we CAN and WILL achieve the goal if we remain focused.
GOD Bless,
Mairi
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/08/anti-net-neutrality-bill-passes-house-of-reps_n_846923.html
Do you support this?
I so support Trump and his thesis about Obama's birth. Sad to note that you are not agreeing with him
I have no poblem with Obama's providing his birth certificate. I raised that when he was running, but the Democratic Party legacy media resisted because of its opposition to open government.
As far as Trump, he should have raised the question in '08 when it would have made a difference, as I did.
As far as Trump as a presidential candidate, he is a knucklehead who was born with a silver spoon in his mouth. He is a protectionist who has benefited from the Fed and from special privileges from New York City's socialist government all his life. I wouldn't vote for that moron if were running for dog catcher.
If you had been following Mitchell way back in the "birthers'" infancy, you would know he was a true champion of the effort. He has never shied away, he's just quieted down a bit.
Mitchell is the reason I finally became involved, and became also a huge fan of Mitchell's. He's my hero on eligibility! He was all after proof of eligibility BEFORE it became "fashionable"!
Trump is so late to the game, and I have my own theory on the situation.
Following directly on the heels of "Deadfish's" election as Chicago Mayor, came word from Trump that he was wanting proof of eligibility. Rahm KNOWS which closets hide the skeletons, and true to his own admonition to "never waste a good crisis", we have Trump everywhere demanding proof! Trump paid a LOT of money to make certain Deadfish got elected.
Truth is, thanks to Mitchell, I have great evidence for the Illinois "Meroni" case. In Illinois, you have just five days to challenge a ballot admission. I sent Dan White, and others, a certified letter on Aug. 28, 2008 challenging Barack's credentials to be Senator, much less candidate for POTUS. Barack filed for placement on Aug. 29th. That certified letter is THE ONLY letter of mine Dan White ever responded to. A challenge WAS made to the IL BoE within five days of Barack's placement on the ballots here.
If Deadfish stays angry, and Trump decides it is worth the cost to support him, then Barack's little "make believe" world will unravel VERY quickly.......I'm enjoying the show as it does! Now......please pass the popcorn.
But Dr. Langbert has not mentioned the theory that the grandparents "made" Obama a citizen to collect welfare. That is a very plausible theory. It is sad to see that Dr. Langbert is missing in action on the more important theories.
I suspect that Obama did not even go to Columbia University. I think that Dr. Langbert got his PhD from there. Did he ever meet Obama, see him. Dr. Langbert has never answered this question. Does this failure to answer mean that Dr. Langbert is protecting Obama? I suspect that he is. Dr. Langbert created all of the smoke on Obama's birth certificate, but the truth is that he created the smoke to hide the fact that he does in fact know Obama. Is Dr. Langbert protecting Obama and hiding something from us?
Simple solution. Stop electing attorneys and members of other secret societies- it doesn't matter which party.
Maybe if Trump gets elected no attorney will get ever get paid again ! ha ha...that's it ! Restore the rule of law and the divine right of man and throw this "legal system" in the trash can along with its divine right of kings and the United States ! Restore America and the divine right of man.
I'm not sure what to think of Rand and Ron.
You folks down south spell attourney differently than we do up here in the great white north. Personally, my spelling starts with a "w", followed by an "e" and an "a"..you get the idea.
Post a Comment